» Articles » PMID: 30071708

Regimen-related Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis Using Hypertonic Glucose Solution: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Aug 4
PMID 30071708
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to quantify the risk of mortality linked to various regimens of hypertonic peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients using home-based PD was carried out. The prescribed regimen of glucose-based PD solution for all patients, determined on the basis of their individual conditions, was extracted from their medical chart records. The primary outcome was death. The treatment regimens were categorized into 3 groups according to the type of PD solution used: original PD (1.5% glucose), shuffle PD (1.5 and 2.5% glucose), and serialized PD (2.5 and 4.5% glucose). Multivariate analysis (using the Weibull model) was applied to comprehensively examine survival probabilities related to the explanatory variable, while adjusting for other potential confounders.

Results: Of 300 consecutive patients, 38% died over a median follow-up time of 30 months (interquartile range: 15-46 months). Multivariate analysis showed that a treatment regimen with continued higher-strength PD solution (serialized PD) resulted in a lower survival rate than when the conventional strength solution was used (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 4.6, <0.01). Five interrelated risk factors (age, length of time on PD, hemoglobin levels, albumin levels, and oliguria) were significant predictors contributing to the outcome.

Conclusions: Frequent exposure to high levels of glucose PD solution significantly contributed to a 2-fold higher rate of death, especially when hypertonic glucose was prescribed continuously.

Citing Articles

Associations of Glucometabolic Indices with Aortic Stiffness in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis with and without Diabetes Mellitus.

Tang C, Tsai J, Chen Y, Hung S, Lin Y, Hsu B Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(23).

PMID: 38069423 PMC: 10707165. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317094.

References
1.
Krediet R, Lindholm B, Rippe B . Pathophysiology of peritoneal membrane failure. Perit Dial Int. 2000; 20 Suppl 4:S22-42. View

2.
Tong J, Liu M, Li H, Luo Z, Zhong X, Huang J . Mortality and Associated Risk Factors in Dialysis Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2016; 41(4):479-87. DOI: 10.1159/000443449. View

3.
Baroni G, Schuinski A, P de Moraes T, Meyer F, Pecoits-Filho R . Inflammation and the peritoneal membrane: causes and impact on structure and function during peritoneal dialysis. Mediators Inflamm. 2012; 2012:912595. PMC: 3323921. DOI: 10.1155/2012/912595. View

4.
Kadota A, Hozawa A, Okamura T, Kadowak T, Nakmaura K, Murakami Y . Relationship between metabolic risk factor clustering and cardiovascular mortality stratified by high blood glucose and obesity: NIPPON DATA90, 1990-2000. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(6):1533-8. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2074. View

5.
Kam-Tao Li P, Szeto C, Piraino B, de Arteaga J, Fan S, Figueiredo A . ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment. Perit Dial Int. 2016; 36(5):481-508. PMC: 5033625. DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00078. View