» Articles » PMID: 30071644

Typical and Atypical Inducers of Lysosomal Cell Death: A Promising Anticancer Strategy

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2018 Aug 4
PMID 30071644
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lysosomes are conservative organelles with an indispensable role in cellular degradation and the recycling of macromolecules. However, in light of recent findings, it has emerged that the role of lysosomes in cancer cells extends far beyond cellular catabolism and includes a variety of cellular pathways, such as proliferation, metastatic potential, and drug resistance. It has been well described that malignant transformation leads to alterations in lysosomal structure and function, which, paradoxically, renders cancer cells more sensitive to lysosomal destabilization. Furthermore, lysosomes are implicated in the regulation and execution of cell death in response to diverse stimuli and it has been shown that lysosome-dependent cell death can be utilized to overcome apoptosis and drug resistance. Thus, the purpose of this review is to characterize the role of lysosome in cancer therapy and to describe how these organelles impact treatment resistance. We summarized the characteristics of typical inducers of lysosomal cell death, which exert its function primarily via alterations in the lysosomal compartment. The review also presents other anticancer agents with the predominant mechanism of action different from lysosomal destabilization, the activity of which is influenced by lysosomal signaling, including classical chemotherapeutics, kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, as well as photodynamic therapy.

Citing Articles

Radiosensitizing capacity of fenofibrate in glioblastoma cells depends on lipid metabolism.

Alkotub B, Bauer L, Bashiri Dezfouli A, Hachani K, Ntziachristos V, Multhoff G Redox Biol. 2024; 79():103452.

PMID: 39667305 PMC: 11697781. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103452.


Challenges of Regulated Cell Death: Implications for Therapy Resistance in Cancer.

DAmico M, De Amicis F Cells. 2024; 13(13.

PMID: 38994937 PMC: 11240625. DOI: 10.3390/cells13131083.


Underlying Mechanism of Lysosomal Membrane Permeabilization in CNS Injury: A Literature Review.

Xiang L, Lou J, Zhao J, Geng Y, Zhang J, Wu Y Mol Neurobiol. 2024; 62(1):626-642.

PMID: 38888836 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-024-04290-6.


Phenazine Cations as Anticancer Theranostics.

Noakes F, Smitten K, Maple L, Bernardino de la Serna J, Robertson C, Pritchard D J Am Chem Soc. 2024; 146(18):12836-12849.

PMID: 38683943 PMC: 11082890. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c03491.


Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data reveals prognostic characteristics of lysosome-dependent cell death-related genes in osteosarcoma.

Wu Y, Yang J, Xu G, Chen X, Qu X BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):379.

PMID: 38632516 PMC: 11022332. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10283-5.


References
1.
Lewis C, Voelkel-Johnson C, Smith C . Suppression of c-Myc and RRM2 expression in pancreatic cancer cells by the sphingosine kinase-2 inhibitor ABC294640. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(37):60181-60192. PMC: 5312377. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11112. View

2.
Kaur J, Debnath J . Autophagy at the crossroads of catabolism and anabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015; 16(8):461-72. DOI: 10.1038/nrm4024. View

3.
Yu L, Wu W, Gu C, Zhong D, Zhao X, Kong Y . Obatoclax impairs lysosomal function to block autophagy in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant esophageal cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(12):14693-707. PMC: 4924745. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7492. View

4.
Granato M, Lacconi V, Peddis M, Lotti L, Di Renzo L, Renzo L . HSP70 inhibition by 2-phenylethynesulfonamide induces lysosomal cathepsin D release and immunogenic cell death in primary effusion lymphoma. Cell Death Dis. 2013; 4:e730. PMC: 3730433. DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2013.263. View

5.
Doulias P, Kotoglou P, Tenopoulou M, Keramisanou D, Tzavaras T, Brunk U . Involvement of heat shock protein-70 in the mechanism of hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage: the role of lysosomes and iron. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007; 42(4):567-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.11.022. View