» Articles » PMID: 30071146

A Randomized Phase II Trial of MOVING ON: An Intervention to Increase Exercise Outcome Expectations Among Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview
Journal Psychooncology
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Oncology
Psychology
Date 2018 Aug 3
PMID 30071146
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to test theoretical intervention fidelity and feasibility of MOVING ON, a self-directed, home-based, randomized controlled trial to increase exercise outcome expectations (OEs) (what one expects to obtain or avoid as a result of a behavior or lack thereof), among breast cancer survivors.

Method: Stage Ia to IIb survivors (n = 60) were given the MOVING ON intervention or control booklet. Data were collected through online surveys and an accelerometer at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postintervention. Fidelity was measured by questions assessing participant perceptions of MOVING ON (score ≥2) and direction of intervention effects. Feasibility was measured by recruitment rate (target of 60 participants in 6 months), retention (total attrition <17%), and acquisition of accelerometer data (% ≥subjective exercise data obtained). Analyses consisted of descriptive statistics, mixed models, and content analysis.

Results: Fidelity met a priori criteria (mean = 3.31, SD = 0.87). Outcome expectations increased 0.01 points, and weekly steps increased by 970 every 4 weeks in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. All effect sizes were small, ranging from 0.01 to 0.09. Target enrollment, achieved in 17 weeks, met a priori feasibility criteria. Retention (66%) and accelerometer data acquisition (60%) (compared to 73% of subjective exercise data) did not.

Conclusion: MOVING ON influenced OEs as intended and was well received by participants. A fully powered study, of this low-cost, easy-to-implement intervention, is warranted. Intervention and measurement strategies used in MOVING ON can be incorporated in any study targeting OEs as a mediator of exercise or collecting exercise data with an accelerometer.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the utility of temporal self-regulation theory for understanding physical activity outcomes in a behavioral weight loss maintenance program.

Field C, Leahey T, Denmat Z, Wyckoff E, Gilder C, OConnor K Psychol Health. 2024; :1-18.

PMID: 38720583 PMC: 11543920. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2347656.


The Use of Wearable Devices in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review.

Chow R, Drkulec H, Im J, Tsai J, Nafees A, Kumar S Oncologist. 2023; 29(4):e419-e430.

PMID: 37971410 PMC: 10994271. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad305.


Theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Rodrigues B, Carraca E, Francisco B, Nobre I, Cortez-Pinto H, Santos I J Cancer Surviv. 2023; 18(5):1464-1480.

PMID: 37133640 PMC: 11424668. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01390-5.


Barriers and facilitators to the engagement of physical activity among Black and African American cancer survivors during and after treatments.

Hirschey R, Xu J, Lea D, Milner J, Duggins P, Coleman K Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(2):136.

PMID: 36700992 PMC: 9877498. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07601-0.


Update to 2019-2022 ONS Research Agenda: Rapid Review to Address Structural Racism and Health Inequities.

Jones R, Hirschey R, Campbell G, Cooley M, Somayaji D, Lally R Oncol Nurs Forum. 2021; 48(6):589-600.

PMID: 34673760 PMC: 8674842. DOI: 10.1188/21.ONF.589-600.


References
1.
Brassington G, Atienza A, Perczek R, DiLorenzo T, King A . Intervention-related cognitive versus social mediators of exercise adherence in the elderly. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23(2 Suppl):80-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00477-4. View

2.
Pinto B, Trunzo J, Reiss P, Shiu S . Exercise participation after diagnosis of breast cancer: trends and effects on mood and quality of life. Psychooncology. 2002; 11(5):389-400. DOI: 10.1002/pon.594. View

3.
Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard R . Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992; 17(4):338-45. View

4.
Bandura A . Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(2):143-64. DOI: 10.1177/1090198104263660. View

5.
Schutzer K, Graves B . Barriers and motivations to exercise in older adults. Prev Med. 2004; 39(5):1056-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.003. View