» Articles » PMID: 30066304

The Cost of a Euploid Embryo Identified from Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A): a Counseling Tool

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Aug 2
PMID 30066304
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the expected out-of-pocket costs of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to attain a 50%, 75%, or 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst based on individual age and AMH, and develop a personalized counseling tool.

Methods: A cost analysis was performed and a counseling tool was developed using retrospective data from IVF cycles intended for PGT or blastocyst freeze-all between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2017 (n = 330) and aggregate statistics on euploidy rates of > 149,000 embryos from CooperGenomics. Poisson regression was used to determine the number of biopsiable blastocysts obtained per cycle, based on age and AMH. The expected costs of attaining a 50%, 75%, and 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst were determined via 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations for each age and AMH combination, incorporating age-based euploidy rates and IVF/PGT-A cost assumptions.

Results: The cost to attain a 50% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst ranges from approximately $15,000 U.S. dollars (USD) for younger women with higher AMH values (≥ 2 ng/mL) to > $150,000 for the oldest women (44 years) with the lowest AMH values (< 0.1 ng/mL) in this cohort. The cost to attain a 75% versus 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst is similar (~ $16,000) for younger women with higher AMH values, but varies for the oldest women with low AMH values (~ $280,000 and > $450,000, respectively). A typical patient (36-37 years, AMH 2.5 ng/mL) should expect to spend ~ $30,000 for a 90% likelihood of attaining a euploid embryo.

Conclusions: This tool can serve as a counseling adjunct by providing individualized cost information for patients regarding PGT-A.

Citing Articles

PGT-A: what's it for, what's wrong?.

Viville S, Aboulghar M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(1):63-69.

PMID: 39847200 PMC: 11806166. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03400-0.


Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic procedures.

Kaye D Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2023; 9(1):1.

PMID: 36737803 PMC: 9896777. DOI: 10.1186/s40748-023-00146-4.


Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M).

Zhang J, Rubin L, Zierhut H, Pastore L Reprod Sci. 2021; 28(11):3272-3281.

PMID: 34131887 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00644-w.


The First Live Birth in Lithuania After Application of Preimplantation Genetic Testing.

Gudleviciene Z, Bausyte R, Dagyte E, Balkeliene D, Utkus A, Ramasauskaite D Acta Med Litu. 2021; 27(2):76-83.

PMID: 34113212 PMC: 7968950. DOI: 10.15388/Amed.2020.27.2.5.


Thaw, biopsy and refreeze strategy for PGT-A on previously cryopreserved embryos.

Wilding M, Terribile M, Parisi I, Nargund G Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020; 11(3):223-227.

PMID: 32082528 PMC: 7020945.


References
1.
Hansen K, Hodnett G, Knowlton N, Craig L . Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril. 2010; 95(1):170-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006. View

2.
Lai H, Chuang T, Wong L, Lee M, Hsieh C, Wang H . Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Cytogenet. 2017; 10:14. PMC: 5405548. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-017-0315-7. View

3.
Kushnir V, Barad D, Albertini D, Darmon S, Gleicher N . Effect of Embryo Banking on U.S. National Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Birth Rates. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0154620. PMC: 4861597. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154620. View

4.
Forman E, Tao X, Ferry K, Taylor D, Treff N, Scott Jr R . Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(4):1217-22. PMC: 3303493. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des020. View

5.
Feichtinger M, Vaccari E, Carli L, Wallner E, Madel U, Figl K . Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 34(6):583-589. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.015. View