» Articles » PMID: 30060108

Socioeconomic Position and DNA Methylation Age Acceleration Across the Life Course

Overview
Journal Am J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Jul 31
PMID 30060108
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accelerated DNA methylation age is linked to all-cause mortality and environmental factors, but studies of associations with socioeconomic position are limited. Researchers generally use small selected samples, and it is unclear how findings obtained with 2 commonly used methods for calculating methylation age (the Horvath method and the Hannum method) translate to general population samples including younger and older adults. Among 1,099 United Kingdom adults aged 28-98 years in 2011-2012, we assessed the relationship of Horvath and Hannum DNA methylation age acceleration with a range of social position measures: current income and employment, education, income and unemployment across a 12-year period, and childhood social class. Accounting for confounders, participants who had been less advantaged in childhood were epigenetically "older" as adults: In comparison with participants who had professional/managerial parents, Hannum age was 1.07 years higher (95% confidence interval: 0.20, 1.94) for participants with parents in semiskilled/unskilled occupations and 1.85 years higher (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 3.02) for those without a working parent at age 14 years. No other robust associations were seen. Results accord with research implicating early life circumstances as critical for DNA methylation age in adulthood. Since methylation age acceleration as measured by the Horvath and Hannum estimators appears strongly linked to chronological age, researchers examining associations with the social environment must take steps to avoid age-related confounding.

Citing Articles

Greater residential greenness is associated with reduced epigenetic aging in adults.

Egorov A, Griffin S, Klein J, Guo W, Styles J, Kobylanski J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3558.

PMID: 39875388 PMC: 11775256. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82747-3.


Differing Effects of Alcohol Use on Epigenetic and Brain Age in Adult Children of Parents with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Scholl J, Pearson K, Fercho K, Van Asselt A, Kallsen N, Ehli E Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766462 PMC: 11674551. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121263.


Second Generation DNA Methylation Age Predicts Cognitive Change in Midlife: The Moderating Role of Childhood Socioeconomic Status.

Bell S, Beam C, Zandi E, Kam A, Andrews E, Becker J Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39764108 PMC: 11703339. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5551592/v1.


Predictive power of epigenetic age - opportunities and cautions.

Nardini C, Di Lena P Epigenomics. 2024; 17(2):75-77.

PMID: 39580637 PMC: 11792792. DOI: 10.1080/17501911.2024.2433409.


Stay social, stay young: a bioanthropological outlook on the processes linking sociality and ageing.

Iannuzzi V, Narboux-Neme N, Lehoczki A, Levi G, Giuliani C Geroscience. 2024; 47(1):721-744.

PMID: 39527178 PMC: 11872968. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01416-5.


References
1.
Houseman E, Accomando W, Koestler D, Christensen B, Marsit C, Nelson H . DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012; 13:86. PMC: 3532182. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86. View

2.
Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S . Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2012; 49(2):359-367. PMC: 3780611. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. View

3.
Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Davey Smith G . Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 60(1):7-12. PMC: 2465546. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531. View

4.
Nevalainen T, Kananen L, Marttila S, Jylhava J, Mononen N, Kahonen M . Obesity accelerates epigenetic aging in middle-aged but not in elderly individuals. Clin Epigenetics. 2017; 9:20. PMC: 5310016. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0301-7. View

5.
Goldberg D, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun T, Piccinelli M, Gureje O . The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997; 27(1):191-7. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291796004242. View