» Articles » PMID: 30055654

Utilization and Cost of Electronic Resources in Adult Cancer Center

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Jul 30
PMID 30055654
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the knowledge of healthcare providers and the cost of the current institutional e-resources in an adult oncology setting. To assess the awareness, accessibility, and utilization of the available intranet e-resources, a survey questionnaire was distributed to all oncology healthcare practitioners (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) in an adult oncology center. The e-resources were divided into two main categories: pre-paid and institution-specific. The cost of the pre-paid e-resources was obtained from the relevant department. The cost of the institution-specific e-resources was calculated based on the human cost spent developing these e-resources; the cost of the information technology (IT) and the organizational overhead were also taken into consideration.

Results: Institution-specific e-resources constituted the majority (62%) versus (38%) for pre-paid. The overall awareness, access, and frequent utilization of institution-specific e-resources, as compared to pre-paid e-resources, were low (< 50%). The cost of the institution-specific e-resources was $1,137,196, which was more than ten times higher than the pre-paid e-resources. This study identifies the general lack of awareness and utilization of institutional e-resources. The low utilization coupled with the high cost of the institution-specific e-resources makes pre-paid e-resources an attractive alternative for any institution.

Citing Articles

Digital skills of health care professionals in cancer care: A systematic review.

Leena T, Jenna P, Carme C, Leeni L, Helena L, Sonia M Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241240907.

PMID: 38528966 PMC: 10962045. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241240907.

References
1.
Main C, Moxham T, Wyatt J, Kay J, Anderson R, Stein K . Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems. Health Technol Assess. 2010; 14(48):1-227. DOI: 10.3310/hta14480. View

2.
Hou S . Health Literacy Online: A Guide to Writing and Designing Easy-to-Use Health Web Sites. Health Promot Pract. 2012; 13(5):577-80. DOI: 10.1177/1524839912446480. View

3.
Kuperman G, Bobb A, Payne T, Avery A, Gandhi T, Burns G . Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 14(1):29-40. PMC: 2215064. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2170. View

4.
Phansalkar S, Wright A, Kuperman G, Vaida A, Bobb A, Jenders R . Towards meaningful medication-related clinical decision support: recommendations for an initial implementation. Appl Clin Inform. 2013; 2(1):50-62. PMC: 3631914. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2010-04-RA-0026. View

5.
Guardabasso V, Angeli G . Some tools for the diffusion of biomedical information using research networks. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992; 670:215-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb26093.x. View