» Articles » PMID: 30055496

The Importance of Bioconcentration into the Pelagic Food Web Base for Methylmercury Biomagnification: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2018 Jul 29
PMID 30055496
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) transfer from water into the base of the food web (bioconcentration) and subsequent biomagnification in the aquatic food web leads to most of the MeHg in fish. But how important is bioconcentration compared to biomagnification in predicting MeHg in fish? To answer this question we reviewed articles in which MeHg concentrations in water, plankton (seston and/or zooplankton), as well as fish (planktivorous and small omnivorous fish) were reported. This yielded 32 journal articles with data from 59 aquatic ecosystems at 22 sites around the world. Although there are many case studies of particular aquatic habitats and specific geographic areas that have examined MeHg bioconcentration and biomagnification, we performed a meta-analysis of such studies. Aqueous MeHg was not a significant predictor of MeHg in fish, but MeHg in seston i.e., the base of the aquatic food web, predicted 63% of the variability in fish MeHg. The MeHg bioconcentration factors (i.e., transfer of MeHg from water to seston; BCF) varied from 3 to 7 orders of magnitude across sites and correlated significantly with MeHg in fish. The MeHg biomagnification factors from zooplankton to fish varied much less (logBMF, 0.75 ± 0.31), and did not significantly correlate with fish MeHg, suggesting that zooplanktivory is not as important as bioconcentration in the biomagnification of fish MeHg across the range of ecosystems represented in our meta-analysis. Partial least square (PLS) and linear regression analyses identified several environmental factors associated with increased BCF, including low dissolved organic carbon, low pH, and oligotrophy. Our study reveals the widespread importance of MeHg bioconcentration into the base of the aquatic food web for MeHg at higher trophic levels in aquatic food webs, as well as the major influences on the variability in this bioconcentration.

Citing Articles

Methylmercury sorption to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers and relevance to environmental exposure.

Sizmur T, Frost H, Felipe-Sotelo M, Bond T, Mallory M, ODriscoll N Environ Toxicol Chem. 2025; 44(2):335-343.

PMID: 39919244 PMC: 11816310. DOI: 10.1093/etojnl/vgae067.


China's municipal wastewater policies enhanced seafood safety and offset health risks from atmospheric mercury emissions in the past four decades.

Cai X, Yang M, Liu M, Chen Y, Yu C, Zhang H Nat Food. 2025; 6(2):182-195.

PMID: 39748033 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01093-9.


The persistent DDT footprint of ocean disposal, and ecological controls on bioaccumulation in fishes.

McGill L, Sleugh T, Petrik C, Schiff K, McLaughlin K, Aluwihare L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(45):e2401500121.

PMID: 39467121 PMC: 11551384. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401500121.


A Meta-Analysis of Mercury Biomagnification in Freshwater Predatory Invertebrates: Community Diversity and Dietary Exposure Drive Variability.

Sinclair C, Garcia T, Eagles-Smith C Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(43):19429-19439.

PMID: 39392791 PMC: 11526377. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c05920.


What does scientometry tell us about mercury toxicology and its biological impairments?.

Baia-da-Silva D, Mendes P, Silva D, Chemelo V, Bittencourt L, Padilha P Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e27526.

PMID: 38586377 PMC: 10998116. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27526.