» Articles » PMID: 30054760

Body Temperature and Mouse Scoring Systems As Surrogate Markers of Death in Cecal Ligation and Puncture Sepsis

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2018 Jul 29
PMID 30054760
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite increasing ethical standards for conducting animal research, death is still often used as an endpoint in mouse sepsis studies. Recently, the Murine Sepsis Score (MSS), Mouse Clinical Assessment Score for Sepsis (M-CASS), and Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS) were developed as surrogate endpoint scoring systems for assessing pain and disease severity in mice. The objective of our study was to compare the effectiveness of these scoring systems and monitoring of body temperature for predicting disease progression and death in the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis model, in order to better inform selection of surrogate endpoints for death in experimental sepsis.

Methods: C57Bl/6J mice were subjected to control sham surgery, or moderate or severe CLP sepsis. All mice were monitored every 4 h for surrogate markers of death using modified versions of the MSS, M-CASS, and MGS scoring systems until 24 h post-operatively, or until endpoint (inability to ambulate) and consequent euthanasia.

Results: Thirty percent of mice subjected to moderate severity CLP reached endpoint by 24 h post-CLP, whereas 100% undergoing severe CLP reached endpoint within 20 h. Modified MSS, M-CASS, and MGS scores all increased, while body temperature decreased, in a time-dependent and sepsis severity-dependent manner, although modified M-CASS scores showed substantial variability. Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrate that the last recorded body temperature (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI 0.77-0.99), change in body temperature (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI 0.78-0.99), modified M-CASS (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.00), and modified MSS (AUC = 0.95; 95% CI 0.88-1.01) scores are all robust for predicting death in CLP sepsis, whereas modified MGS (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.92) is less robust.

Conclusions: The modified MSS and body temperature are effective markers for assessing disease severity and predicting death in the CLP model, and should thus be considered as valid surrogate markers to replace death as an endpoint in mouse CLP sepsis studies.

Citing Articles

Biofilm Dispersal and Wound Infection Clearance With Preclinical Debridement Agents.

Schneider R, Hamdan J, Rumbaugh K Int Wound J. 2025; 22(3):e70145.

PMID: 40069969 PMC: 11896880. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70145.


Adenosine A2A Receptor Activation Alleviated Disease of Mice with Systemic Infection by Regulating Macrophage Function.

Wu X, Dong K, Liu Y, Yang L, Zhang J, Yang M J Inflamm Res. 2025; 18:3283-3294.

PMID: 40065909 PMC: 11892491. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S501546.


Contactless body temperature assessment for signalling humane endpoints in a mouse model of sepsis.

Miranda C, Oliveira L, Carmo A, Olsson I, Franco N Anim Welf. 2025; 34:e13.

PMID: 40028439 PMC: 11867820. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2025.10.


Genetic variation in IL-4 activated tissue resident macrophages determines strain-specific synergistic responses to LPS epigenetically.

Zhao M, Jankovic D, Link V, Souza C, Hornick K, Oyesola O Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1030.

PMID: 39863579 PMC: 11762786. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56379-8.


Enterobactin inhibits microbiota-dependent activation of AhR to promote bacterial sepsis in mice.

Keskey R, Xiao J, Hyoju S, Lam A, Kim D, Sidebottom A Nat Microbiol. 2025; 10(2):388-404.

PMID: 39779878 PMC: 11905502. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-024-01882-9.


References
1.
Subbe C, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L . Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM. 2001; 94(10):521-6. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521. View

2.
Weixelbaumer K, Raeven P, Redl H, van Griensven M, Bahrami S, Osuchowski M . Repetitive low-volume blood sampling method as a feasible monitoring tool in a mouse model of sepsis. Shock. 2010; 34(4):420-6. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181dc0918. View

3.
Drechsler S, Weixelbaumer K, Weidinger A, Raeven P, Khadem A, Redl H . Why do they die? Comparison of selected aspects of organ injury and dysfunction in mice surviving and dying in acute abdominal sepsis. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015; 3(1):48. PMC: 4513036. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-015-0048-z. View

4.
Rittirsch D, Huber-Lang M, Flierl M, Ward P . Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(1):31-6. PMC: 2754226. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.214. View

5.
Nemzek J, Xiao H, Minard A, Bolgos G, Remick D . Humane endpoints in shock research. Shock. 2003; 21(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1097/01.shk.0000101667.49265.fd. View