» Articles » PMID: 30054013

Comparing a Single-staged Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus a Two-staged Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Overview
Journal Surgery
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Jul 29
PMID 30054013
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the advent of minimally invasive surgery, the limits of surgery have been stretched by questioning the more usual, established 2-stage approach for choledocholithiasis with an initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in favor of the single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the related benefits, difficulties, and outcomes of these 2 methods at a single institution.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 128 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria was divided into 2 groups (n = 68 for the group with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and n = 60 for the group with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography/laparoscopic cholecystectomy) between 2014 and 2017. Patient data including age, sex, duration of the operation, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and duration of hospital stay were reviewed.

Results: The group with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy had 24 men and 44 women (mean age 52 years), and the group with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography/laparoscopic cholecystectomy had 16 men and 44 women (mean age 47 years). Statistically significant results were found in the clearance range (100% in the group with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus 75% in the group with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography/laparoscopic cholecystectomy), a shorter total duration of hospitalization for the group with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4.1 days vs 8.4 days) (P < .05), but a great incidence of biliary leakage in the group with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Duration of surgery was not different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a single-stage procedure that has many advantages over endoscopic retrograde cholangiography/laparoscopic cholecystectomy if appropriate experience and when expertise is available.

Citing Articles

Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous: An Effective and Safe Approach in the Management of Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis in Selected Patients.

Percario R, Panaccio P, Caldarella M, Trappoliere M, Marino M, Farrukh M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004839 PMC: 11856840. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041310.


Single-Stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy Versus Two-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patients With Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review.

Manivasagam S, Chandra J N, Shah S, Kuraria V, Manocha P Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54685.

PMID: 38524041 PMC: 10960563. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54685.


The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic approach for the management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones in patients with prior biliary tract surgical interventions.

Liu Y, Li T, Wu S, Fan Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14487.

PMID: 36008517 PMC: 9411189. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18930-1.


Is Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Safe for the Oldest Old Patients?.

Yeon H, Moon J, Lee S, Choi I Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022; 26(2):140-147.

PMID: 35569921 PMC: 9271399. DOI: 10.4235/agmr.22.0026.


Strict Surgical Repair for Bile Leakage Following the Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy.

Zhang K, Wu L, Gao K, Yan C, Zheng C, Guo C Front Surg. 2021; 8:641127.

PMID: 34017852 PMC: 8130580. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.641127.