» Articles » PMID: 30050787

Review of Radiological Screening Programmes for Breast, Lung and Pancreatic Malignancy

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Jul 28
PMID 30050787
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The premise of medical screening is to identify clinically occult disease, facilitating intervention at an early stage with the intention of improving prognosis. Identifying solid organ malignancy before nodal or distal metastases have occurred unanimously offers the best chance of successful radical treatment, thus there is clearly a potential significant mortality benefit for successful oncological screening programmes. However, the negative consequences of screening have to be considered, particularly the impact of intervening in asymptomatic populations. Diagnostic radiology has an invaluable ability to non-invasively detect disease and has developed an essential role in several oncological screening programmes with new programmes emerging. These include the established mammography screening programme for breast carcinoma, the emerging CT screening programme for lung carcinoma and a new proposed radiological screening programme for pancreatic carcinoma. Results from published randomized controlled trials analysing the benefits of radiological screening have been convoluted and conflicting. Cancer screening remains a widely contested topic and it is a challenge for both radiologist and clinician to assess the risks and benefits at both a population and individual patient level. In this article, we discuss radiological screening and analyse the current literature on these programmes, with evaluation of recently published studies and ongoing trials.

Citing Articles

Screening for lung cancer using thin-slice low-dose computed tomography in southwestern China: a population-based real-world study.

Wu J, Li R, Zhang H, Zheng Q, Tao W, Yang M Thorac Cancer. 2024; 15(19):1522-1532.

PMID: 38798230 PMC: 11219290. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15383.


Interest in mammography across European countries: a retrospective "Google Trends" comparative study.

Di Gennaro G, Licata F, Greco F, Zobel B, Mallio C Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(11):7523-7529.

PMID: 37969630 PMC: 10644145. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-196.


Enhanced ultrasound-guided versus non-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in tissue cellularity of lung malignancies: a propensity score matched study.

Zhou D, Zhang Y, Chen W, Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhou X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(11):5056-5067.

PMID: 36330190 PMC: 9622440. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-119.


Can Pre-biopsy Second-Look Breast Ultrasound Affect Clinical Management? Experience From a Single Tertiary Hospital.

Ma L, Qin J, Kong L, Zhao J, Xiao M, Wang H Front Oncol. 2022; 12:901757.

PMID: 35712464 PMC: 9192959. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901757.


Relationship Dynamics among Couples Dealing with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Valente M, Chirico I, Ottoboni G, Chattat R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(14).

PMID: 34299738 PMC: 8303482. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147288.


References
1.
Field J, Duffy S, Baldwin D, Whynes D, Devaraj A, Brain K . UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening. Thorax. 2015; 71(2):161-70. PMC: 4752629. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207140. View

2.
Del Chiaro M, Verbeke C, Kartalis N, Pozzi Mucelli R, Gustafsson P, Hansson J . Short-term Results of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Swedish Screening Program for Individuals at Risk for Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015; 150(6):512-8. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3852. View

3.
Miller A, Wall C, Baines C, Sun P, To T, Narod S . Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2014; 348:g366. PMC: 3921437. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g366. View

4.
Henschke C, Yankelevitz D, Libby D, Pasmantier M, Smith J, Miettinen O . Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(17):1763-71. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060476. View

5.
Stoop E, de Haan M, de Wijkerslooth T, Bossuyt P, van Ballegooijen M, Nio C . Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 13(1):55-64. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70283-2. View