» Articles » PMID: 30048025

Overlooked Coral Predators Suppress Foundation Species As Reefs Degrade

Overview
Journal Ecol Appl
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Jul 27
PMID 30048025
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Loss of larger consumers from stressed ecosystems can lead to trophic release of mid-level consumers that then impact foundation species, suppressing ecosystem function and resilience. For example, in coral reef ecosystems, outbreaks of coral predators like crown-of-thorns sea stars have been associated with fishing pressure and can dramatically impact the composition and persistence of corals. However, the ecological impacts, and consequences for management, of smaller, less obvious corallivores remain inadequately understood. We investigated whether reef state (coral vs. seaweed domination) influenced densities and size frequencies of the corallivorous gastropod Coralliophila violacea on its common host, the coral Porites cylindrica, within three pairs of small Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and adjacent fished areas in Fiji. C. violacea densities were 5-35 times greater, and their size frequencies more broadly distributed, within seaweed-dominated fished areas than in adjacent MPAs dominated by corals. Tethering snails (4-9 mm in shell height) in place on their coral hosts indicated that suppression of snails in MPAs was due to predation, apparently by fishes. When tethered on the benthos (where they rarely occur), rather than on their host, mortality of larger snails (15.0-25.0 mm in shell height) was high in all areas, primarily due to hermit crabs killing them and occupying their shells. Because C. violacea is a sessile gastropod that feeds affixed to the base of corals and produces minimal visible damage, it has been considered a "prudent feeder" that minimally impacts its host coral. We assessed this over a 24-d feeding period in the field. Feeding by individual C. violacea reduced P. cylindrica growth by ~18-43% depending on snail size. Our findings highlight the considerable, but underappreciated, negative impacts of this common corallivore on degraded reefs. As reefs degrade and corals are lost, remaining corals (often species of Porites) may gain the full attention of elevated densities of coral consumers. This will further damage the remaining foundation species, suppressing the resilience of corals and enhancing the resilience of degraded, seaweed-dominated reefs.

Citing Articles

Culling corallivores improves short-term coral recovery under bleaching scenarios.

Rogers J, Plaganyi E Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):2520.

PMID: 35534497 PMC: 9085818. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30213-x.


Does Predation Exacerbate the Risk of Endosymbiont Loss in Heat Stressed Hermatypic Corals? Molecular Cues Provide Insights Into Species-Specific Health Outcomes in a Multi-Stressor Ocean.

Madeira C, Dias M, Ferreira A, Gouveia R, Cabral H, Diniz M Front Physiol. 2022; 13:801672.

PMID: 35299660 PMC: 8922028. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.801672.


Rapid enhancement of multiple ecosystem services following the restoration of a coastal foundation species.

Beheshti K, Williams S, Boyer K, Endris C, Clemons A, Grimes T Ecol Appl. 2021; 32(1):e02466.

PMID: 34614246 PMC: 9285811. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2466.


Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes.

Clements C, Burns A, Stewart F, Hay M Anim Microbiome. 2021; 2(1):42.

PMID: 33499998 PMC: 7807496. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-020-00061-5.


Relationships between a common Caribbean corallivorous snail and protected area status, coral cover, and predator abundance.

Shaver E, Renzi J, Bucher M, Silliman B Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16463.

PMID: 33020553 PMC: 7536437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73568-1.


References
1.
Bright A, Cameron C, Miller M . Enhanced susceptibility to predation in corals of compromised condition. PeerJ. 2016; 3:e1239. PMC: 4699786. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1239. View

2.
Clements C, Hay M . Size matters: Predator outbreaks threaten foundation species in small Marine Protected Areas. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):e0171569. PMC: 5293237. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171569. View

3.
Carpenter K, Abrar M, Aeby G, Aronson R, Banks S, Bruckner A . One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science. 2008; 321(5888):560-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1159196. View

4.
Mumby P, Steneck R . Coral reef management and conservation in light of rapidly evolving ecological paradigms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(10):555-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.011. View

5.
Rasher D, Hoey A, Hay M . Consumer diversity interacts with prey defenses to drive ecosystem function. Ecology. 2013; 94(6):1347-58. PMC: 3752656. DOI: 10.1890/12-0389.1. View