» Articles » PMID: 30042403

Multiplex Immunohistochemistry Accurately Defines the Immune Context of Metastatic Melanoma

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jul 26
PMID 30042403
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A prospective study explored the heterogeneous nature of metastatic melanoma using Multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry (FACS). Multiplex IHC data quantitated immune subset number present intra-tumoral (IT) vs the tumor stroma, plus distance of immune subsets from the tumor margin (TM). In addition, mIHC showed a close association between the presence of IT CD8 T cells and PDL1 expression in melanoma, which was more prevalent on macrophages than on melanoma cells. In contrast, FACS provided more detailed information regarding the T cell subset differentiation, their activation status and expression of immune checkpoint molecules. Interestingly, mIHC detected significantly higher Treg numbers than FACS and showed preferential CD4 T cell distribution in the tumor stroma. Based on the mIHC and FACS data, we provide a model which defines metastatic melanoma immune context into four categories using the presence or absence of PDL1 melanoma cells and/or macrophages, and their location within the tumor or on the periphery, combined with the presence or absence of IT CD8 T cells. This model interprets melanoma immune context as a spectrum of tumor escape from immune control, and provides a snapshot upon which interpretation of checkpoint blockade inhibitor (CBI) therapy responses can be built.

Citing Articles

Tebentafusp, a T cell engager, promotes macrophage reprogramming and in combination with IL-2 overcomes macrophage immunosuppression in cancer.

Guc E, Treveil A, Leach E, Broomfield A, Camera A, Clubley J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2374.

PMID: 40064880 PMC: 11893752. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57470-w.


Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: updates and best practices for multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) image analysis and data sharing.

Taube J, Sunshine J, Angelo M, Akturk G, Eminizer M, Engle L J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39779210 PMC: 11749220. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-008875.


Targeting T regulatory (T) cells in immunotherapy-resistant cancers.

Spiliopoulou P, Kaur P, Hammett T, Di Conza G, Lahn M Cancer Drug Resist. 2024; 7:2.

PMID: 38318526 PMC: 10838381. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2023.46.


Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic and predictive factor for Melanoma.

Vargas G, Shafique N, Xu X, Karakousis G Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2024; 24(4):299-310.

PMID: 38314660 PMC: 11134288. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2312102.


Applicability of Spatial Technology in Cancer Research.

Ahn S, Lee H Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 56(2):343-356.

PMID: 38291743 PMC: 11016655. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.1302.


References
1.
Doering T, Crawford A, Angelosanto J, Paley M, Ziegler C, Wherry E . Network analysis reveals centrally connected genes and pathways involved in CD8+ T cell exhaustion versus memory. Immunity. 2012; 37(6):1130-44. PMC: 3749234. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.021. View

2.
Schatton T, Scolyer R, Thompson J, Mihm Jr M . Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their significance in melanoma prognosis. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1102:287-324. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-727-3_16. View

3.
Madore J, Strbenac D, Vilain R, Menzies A, Yang J, Thompson J . PD-L1 Negative Status is Associated with Lower Mutation Burden, Differential Expression of Immune-Related Genes, and Worse Survival in Stage III Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(15):3915-23. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1714. View

4.
Chen P, Roh W, Reuben A, Cooper Z, Spencer C, Prieto P . Analysis of Immune Signatures in Longitudinal Tumor Samples Yields Insight into Biomarkers of Response and Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cancer Discov. 2016; 6(8):827-37. PMC: 5082984. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1545. View

5.
Loi S . Host antitumor immunity plays a role in the survival of patients with newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(27):2935-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7677. View