» Articles » PMID: 30038608

Dynamics of Gut Microbiota Diversity During the Early Development of an Avian Host: Evidence From a Cross-Foster Experiment

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2018 Jul 25
PMID 30038608
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the increasing knowledge on the processes involved in the acquisition and development of the gut microbiota in model organisms, the factors influencing early microbiota successions in natural populations remain poorly understood. In particular, little is known on the role of the rearing environment in the establishment of the gut microbiota in wild birds. Here, we examined the influence of the nesting environment on the gut microbiota of Great tits () by performing a partial cross-fostering experiment during the intermediate stage of nestling development. We found that the cloacal microbiota of great tit nestlings underwent substantial changes between 8 and 15 days of age, with a strong decrease in diversity, an increase in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and a shift in the functional features of the community. Second, the nesting environment significantly influenced community composition, with a divergence among separated true siblings and a convergence among foster siblings. Third, larger shifts in both microbiota diversity and composition correlated with lower nestling body condition. Our results shed new light on the dynamics of microbial diversity during the ontogeny of avian hosts, indicating that the nest environment continues to shape the gut microbiota during the later stages of nestling development and that the increase in gut diversity between hatching and adulthood may not be as linear as previously suspected. Lastly, the microbiota changes incurred during this period may have implications for nestling body condition which can lead to long-term consequences for host fitness.

Citing Articles

Establishment and maturation of gut microbiota in White King pigeon squabs: role of pigeon milk.

Xu X, Wang Z, Jian Y, Zhang L, Zhou C, Liu L Front Microbiol. 2025; 15:1481529.

PMID: 39877755 PMC: 11772371. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1481529.


Social, environmental, and developmental factors affect the microbiota of barn owls (Tyto alba) in a cross-fostering experiment.

Corl A, Charter M, Rozman G, Turjeman S, Toledo S, Kamath P Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):77.

PMID: 39719636 PMC: 11667991. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00365-w.


Manipulating a host-native microbial strain compensates for low microbial diversity by increasing weight gain in a wild bird population.

Somers S, Davidson G, Mbandlwa P, McKeon C, Stanton C, Ross R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(43):e2402352121.

PMID: 39401350 PMC: 11513901. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402352121.


The impact of management on the fecal microbiome of endangered greater sage-grouse () in a zoo-based conservation program.

Vaasjo E, Stothart M, Black S, Poissant J, Whiteside D Conserv Physiol. 2024; 12(1):coae052.

PMID: 39113731 PMC: 11304599. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coae052.


Early-life factors shaping the gut microbiota of Common buzzard nestlings.

Pereira H, Chakarov N, Hoffman J, Rinaud T, Ottensmann M, Gladow K Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):27.

PMID: 38745254 PMC: 11092241. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00313-8.


References
1.
Sklan D, Noy Y . Hydrolysis and absorption in the small intestines of posthatch chicks. Poult Sci. 2000; 79(9):1306-10. DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.9.1306. View

2.
Cummings J, Macfarlane G . Role of intestinal bacteria in nutrient metabolism. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997; 21(6):357-65. DOI: 10.1177/0148607197021006357. View

3.
Barbosa A, Balague V, Valera F, Martinez A, Benzal J, Motas M . Age-Related Differences in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica). PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0153215. PMC: 4824521. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153215. View

4.
Matthysen E, Van de Casteele T, Adriaensen F . Do sibling tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) disperse over similar distances and in similar directions?. Oecologia. 2004; 143(2):301-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1760-7. View

5.
White J, Mirleau P, Danchin E, Mulard H, Hatch S, Heeb P . Sexually transmitted bacteria affect female cloacal assemblages in a wild bird. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13(12):1515-24. PMC: 3772342. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01542.x. View