» Articles » PMID: 30034573

MTOR Inhibitor Therapy and Metabolic Consequences: Where Do We Stand?

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Jul 24
PMID 30034573
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) protein kinase acts as a central integrator of nutrient signaling pathways. Besides the immunosuppressive role after solid organ transplantations or in the treatment of some cancers, another promising role of mTOR inhibitor as an antiaging therapeutic has emerged in the recent years. Acute or intermittent rapamycin treatment has some resemblance to calorie restriction in metabolic effects such as an increased insulin sensitivity. However, the chronic inhibition of mTOR by macrolide rapamycin or other rapalogs has been associated with glucose intolerance and insulin resistance and may even provoke type II diabetes. These metabolic adverse effects limit the use of mTOR inhibitors. Metformin is a widely used drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes which activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), acting as calorie restriction mimetic. In addition to the glucose-lowering effect resulting from the decreased hepatic glucose production and increased glucose utilization, metformin induces fatty acid oxidations. Here, we review the recent advances in our understanding of the metabolic consequences regarding glucose metabolism induced by mTOR inhibitors and compare them to the metabolic profile provoked by metformin use. We further suggest metformin use concurrent with rapalogs in order to pharmacologically address the impaired glucose metabolism and prevent the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus after solid organ transplantations induced by the chronic rapalog treatment.

Citing Articles

Transcripts with high distal heritability mediate genetic effects on complex metabolic traits.

Tyler A, Mahoney J, Keller M, Baker C, Gaca M, Srivastava A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39386475 PMC: 11463413. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.26.613931.


mTOR Dysregulation, Insulin Resistance, and Hypertension.

Stanciu S, Jinga M, Miricescu D, Stefani C, Nica R, Stanescu-Spinu I Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200267 PMC: 11351979. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081802.


Cardio-Oncology Recommendations for Pediatric Oncology Patients: An Australian and New Zealand Delphi Consensus.

Toro C, Felmingham B, Jessop S, Celermajer D, Kotecha R, Govender D JACC Adv. 2024; 1(5):100155.

PMID: 38939459 PMC: 11198111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100155.


Effect of Cellular Senescence in Disease Progression and Transplantation: Immune Cells and Solid Organs.

Kirchner V, Badshah J, Hong S, Martinez O, Pruett T, Niedernhofer L Transplantation. 2023; 108(7):1509-1523.

PMID: 37953486 PMC: 11089077. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004838.


Loss of Macrophage mTORC2 Drives Atherosclerosis via FoxO1 and IL-1β Signaling.

Zhang X, Evans T, Chen S, Sergin I, Stitham J, Jeong S Circ Res. 2023; 133(3):200-219.

PMID: 37350264 PMC: 10527041. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321542.


References
1.
Briaud I, Dickson L, Lingohr M, McCuaig J, Lawrence J, Rhodes C . Insulin receptor substrate-2 proteasomal degradation mediated by a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-induced negative feedback down-regulates protein kinase B-mediated signaling pathway in beta-cells. J Biol Chem. 2004; 280(3):2282-93. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M412179200. View

2.
Kezic A, Becker J, Thaiss F . The effect of mTOR-inhibition on NF-κB activity in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Transplant Proc. 2013; 45(5):1708-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.110. View

3.
Thomson A, Turnquist H, Raimondi G . Immunoregulatory functions of mTOR inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009; 9(5):324-37. PMC: 2847476. DOI: 10.1038/nri2546. View

4.
Weichhart T, Costantino G, Poglitsch M, Rosner M, Zeyda M, Stuhlmeier K . The TSC-mTOR signaling pathway regulates the innate inflammatory response. Immunity. 2008; 29(4):565-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.012. View

5.
Potter C, Pedraza L, Xu T . Akt regulates growth by directly phosphorylating Tsc2. Nat Cell Biol. 2002; 4(9):658-65. DOI: 10.1038/ncb840. View