» Articles » PMID: 30031380

Targeted Prevention in Primary Care Aimed at Lifestyle-related Diseases: a Study Protocol for a Non-randomised Pilot Study

Abstract

Background: The consequences of lifestyle-related disease represent a major burden for the individual as well as for society at large. Individual preventive health checks to the general population have been suggested as a mean to reduce the burden of lifestyle-related diseases, though with mixed evidence on effectiveness. Several systematic reviews, on the other hand, suggest that health checks targeting people at high risk of chronic lifestyle-related diseases may be more effective. The evidence is however very limited. To effectively target people at high risk of lifestyle-related disease, there is a substantial need to advance and implement evidence-based health strategies and interventions that facilitate the identification and management of people at high risk. This paper reports on a non-randomized pilot study carried out to test the acceptability, feasibility and short-term effects of a healthcare intervention in primary care designed to systematically identify persons at risk of developing lifestyle-related disease or who engage in health-risk behavior, and provide targeted and coherent preventive services to these individuals.

Methods: The intervention took place over a three-month period from September 2016 to December 2016. Taking a two-pronged approach, the design included both a joint and a targeted intervention. The former was directed at the entire population, while the latter specifically focused on patients at high risk of a lifestyle-related disease and/or who engage in health-risk behavior. The intervention was facilitated by a digital support system. The evaluation of the pilot will comprise both quantitative and qualitative research methods. All outcome measures are based on validated instruments and aim to provide results pertaining to intervention acceptability, feasibility, and short-term effects.

Discussion: This pilot study will provide a solid empirical base from which to plan and implement a full-scale randomized study with the central aim of determining the efficacy of a preventive health intervention.

Trial Registration: Registered at Clinical Trial Gov (Unique Protocol ID: TOFpilot2016 ). Registered 29 April 2016. The study adheres to the SPIRIT guidelines.

Citing Articles

Digital solutions for decision support in general practice - a rapid review focused on systems developed for the universal healthcare setting in Denmark.

Clausen A, Christensen E, Jakobsen P, Sondergaard J, Abrahamsen B, Rubin K BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):276.

PMID: 38097998 PMC: 10720123. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02234-y.


The Association Between Individualised Religiosity and Health Behaviour in Denmark: Are Social Networks a Mediating Factor?.

Svensson N, Larrabee Sonderlund A, Wehberg S, Hvidt N, Sondergaard J, Thilsing T J Relig Health. 2022; 61(6):4738-4757.

PMID: 36083523 PMC: 9569303. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-022-01650-1.


Patient perspectives on the management of COPD and Type 2 Diabetes in general practice: an interview study.

Lee K, Titlestad S, Norgaard B, Bentzen N, Sondergaard J, Marcussen M BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):174.

PMID: 35836109 PMC: 9284705. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01787-8.


Non-participation in a targeted prevention program aimed at lifestyle-related diseases: a questionnaire-based assessment of patient-reported reasons.

Leick C, Larsen L, Larrabee Sonderlund A, Svensson N, Sondergaard J, Thilsing T BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):970.

PMID: 35562735 PMC: 9107116. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13382-8.


General practitioners' perceptions of treatment of chronically ill patients managed in general practice: An interview study.

Marcussen M, Titlestad S, Lee K, Bentzen N, Sondergaard J, Norgaard B Eur J Gen Pract. 2021; 27(1):103-110.

PMID: 34078226 PMC: 8183538. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1932810.


References
1.
Murray J, Fenton G, Honey S, Bara A, Hill K, House A . A qualitative synthesis of factors influencing maintenance of lifestyle behaviour change in individuals with high cardiovascular risk. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013; 13:48. PMC: 3716917. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-48. View

2.
Krist A, Shenson D, Woolf S, Bradley C, Liaw W, Rothemich S . Clinical and community delivery systems for preventive care: an integration framework. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(4):508-16. PMC: 4544711. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.008. View

3.
Juel K, Sorensen J, Bronnum-Hansen H . Risk factors and public health in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2008; 36 Suppl 1:11-227. DOI: 10.1177/1403494808097590. View

4.
Pottegard A, Schmidt S, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sorensen H, Hallas J, Schmidt M . Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(3):798-798f. PMC: 5837522. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw213. View

5.
Marshall T, Caley M, Hemming K, Gill P, Gale N, Jolly K . Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:908. PMC: 3505746. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-908. View