» Articles » PMID: 30030658

Combination of Solifenacin and Tamsulosin May Provide Additional Beneficial Effects for Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms-outcomes from a Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2018 Jul 22
PMID 30030658
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the different efficacy among generally used drugs for stent-related symptoms (SRS) with the method of network meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in the US National Library of Medicine's life science database (Medline), Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews before December 2017. Analysis was performed under multivariate random-effects network model and effects of drugs were ranked with surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities.

Results: 19 trials with 2036 patients investigating 4 different intervention including tamsulosin (Tam), alfuzosin (Alfu), solifenacin (Soli) and combination of Tam and Solif were finally included in our analysis. Tam plus Soli had the highest SUCRA on all aspects of ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: urinary symptoms (86.2%), body pain (85.0%), general health (80.5%), work performance (72.0%) and sexual performance (84.4%). Except for pain relief, Soli showed higher SUCRA than Tam or Alfu in rest respects. Tam and Alfu showed similar SUCRA on urinary symptoms (53.0 vs 48.7%) and body pain relief (61.9 vs 62.9%).

Conclusions: Tam plus Soli might be the most effective intervention for SRSs. As for monotherapy, Soli showed advantages in most respects except for pain relief compared to Tam or Alfu. Tam and Alfu showed similar efficacy on urinary symptoms and body pain relief.

Citing Articles

Pharmacological treatment of bladder stent symptoms.

Piedad J, Allam M, Mahmalji W Bladder (San Franc). 2024; 11(3):e21200012.

PMID: 39640188 PMC: 11617032. DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0018.


Comparing efficacy and safety of mirabegron, tamsulosin, and solifenacin in ureteral stent-related symptoms: outcomes from a network meta-analysis.

Xiang N, Hu Y, Peng W, Luo M, Yang Y, Zhang Q Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(5):699-707.

PMID: 38855609 PMC: 11157398. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-642.


Comparison of the efficacy and complications of tolterodine and α-adrenergic receptor blockers in improving ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu M, Liu S, Mao Q, Zou Q, Cui Y, Wu J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302716.

PMID: 38701097 PMC: 11068181. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302716.

References
1.
Joshi H, Stainthorpe A, Keeley Jr F, MacDonagh R, Timoney A . Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis. J Endourol. 2001; 15(2):151-4. DOI: 10.1089/089277901750134421. View

2.
Joshi H, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley Jr F, Timoney A . Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology. 2002; 59(4):511-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01644-2. View

3.
Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Gougousis E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Varkarakis I . Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms?. Urology. 2006; 67(1):35-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.038. View

4.
Wiebe N, Vandermeer B, Platt R, Klassen T, Moher D, Barrowman N . A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59(4):342-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.017. View

5.
Damiano R, Autorino R, De Sio M, Giacobbe A, Palumbo I, DArmiento M . Effect of tamsulosin in preventing ureteral stent-related morbidity: a prospective study. J Endourol. 2008; 22(4):651-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0257. View