» Articles » PMID: 30030539

A Simple Model of Mechanical Effects to Estimate Metabolic Cost of Human Walking

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jul 22
PMID 30030539
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the advent of energy measurement devices, gait experiments have shown that energetic economy has a large influence on human walking behavior. However, few cost models have attempted to capture the major energy components under comprehensive walking conditions. Here we present a simple but unified model that uses walking mechanics to estimate metabolic cost at different speeds and step lengths and for six other biomechanically-relevant gait experiments in literature. This includes at various gait postures (e.g. extra foot lift), anthropometric dimensions (e.g. added mass), and reduced gravity conditions, without the need for parameter tuning to design new gait trajectories. Our results suggest that the metabolic cost of walking can largely be explained by the linear combination of four costs-swing and torso dynamics, center of mass velocity redirection, ground clearance, and body weight support. The overall energetic cost is a tradeoff among these separable components, shaped by how they manifest under different walking conditions.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical models in the lower-limb exoskeletons development: a review.

Firouzi V, Seyfarth A, Song S, von Stryk O, Ahmad Sharbafi M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):12.

PMID: 39856714 PMC: 11761726. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01556-5.


Ground Reaction Forces and Joint Moments Predict Metabolic Cost in Physical Performance: Harnessing the Power of Artificial Neural Networks.

Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi A, Fallahtafti F, Antonellis P, Pipinos I, Myers S Appl Sci (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39816988 PMC: 11735018. DOI: 10.3390/app14125210.


Estimating the mechanical cost of transport in human walking with a simple kinematic data-driven mechanical model.

Katwal P, Jaiswal S, Jiang D, Pyrhonen L, Tuomisto J, Rantalainen T PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301706.

PMID: 38626121 PMC: 11020958. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301706.


Women carry for less: body size, pelvis width, loading position and energetics.

Wall-Scheffler C Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 4:e36.

PMID: 37588931 PMC: 10426031. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2022.35.


Why does the metabolic cost of walking increase on compliant substrates?.

Grant B, Charles J, Geraghty B, Gardiner J, DAout K, Falkingham P J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(196):20220483.

PMID: 36448287 PMC: 9709563. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0483.


References
1.
Kuo A . Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. J Biomech Eng. 2002; 124(1):113-20. DOI: 10.1115/1.1427703. View

2.
Heglund N, Cavagna G . Mechanical work, oxygen consumption, and efficiency in isolated frog and rat muscle. Am J Physiol. 1987; 253(1 Pt 1):C22-9. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1987.253.1.C22. View

3.
Bauby C, Kuo A . Active control of lateral balance in human walking. J Biomech. 2000; 33(11):1433-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00101-9. View

4.
Browning R, Modica J, Kram R, Goswami A . The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39(3):515-25. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31802b3562. View

5.
Zarrugh M, TODD F, RALSTON H . Optimization of energy expenditure during level walking. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1974; 33(4):293-306. DOI: 10.1007/BF00430237. View