» Articles » PMID: 30028736

How Useful is Muscle Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Workup of Neuromuscular Diseases?

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Jul 21
PMID 30028736
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: This review focuses on developments in muscle ultrasound as a noninvasive and accurate tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of neuromuscular disease. It discusses current muscle ultrasound applications with already proven clinical value, and highlights recent technical developments that may further advance muscle ultrasounds' diagnostic qualities.

Recent Findings: The sensitivity and specificity of muscle ultrasound for detecting a neuromuscular disorder are high (90-95%), and quantitative ultrasound is well suited to monitor disease progression in several disorders. Adding ultrasound to electromyography significantly improves diagnostic certainty in patients with suspected motor neuron disease, and ultrasound increases the detection of fasciculations with 30-50%. New developments include speckle tracking of tissue motion to quantify diaphragm excursions and diminished muscle contractility in dystrophy, and strain elastography to detect changes in muscle stiffness and anisotropy during contraction and in disease states. Deep learning algorithms are being developed to predict the presence of a muscle disease and differentiate between disorders.

Summary: Muscle ultrasound is excellent for screening, diagnosing, and follow-up of neuromuscular disease. New developments are underway to automate and objectify the diagnostic process, and to quantify tissue motion that can provide new insights in pathophysiology and serve as a biomarker.

Citing Articles

Advancements in imaging techniques for monitoring the respiratory muscles.

Dres M, Doorduin J, Boussouar S, Bachasson D Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):110.

PMID: 40075482 PMC: 11905469. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05339-1.


Real-time artificial intelligence-based texture analysis of muscle ultrasound data for neuromuscular disorder assessment.

Noda Y, Sekiguchi K, Matoba S, Suehiro H, Nishida K, Matsumoto R Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2024; 9:242-248.

PMID: 39282049 PMC: 11402302. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2024.08.003.


The Differences in Parameters in Ultrasound Imaging and Biomechanical Properties of the Quadriceps Femoris with Unilateral Knee Osteoarthritis in the Elderly: A Preliminary Observational Study.

Li J, Wu Z, Lu B, Li C, Wang S, Zhang J Clin Interv Aging. 2024; 19:1479-1491.

PMID: 39220855 PMC: 11363936. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S442610.


Muscle ultrasound in myopathies.

Vicino A, Veltsista D, van Alfen N Curr Opin Neurol. 2024; 37(5):549-557.

PMID: 39051427 PMC: 11377056. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001306.


Skeletal Muscle Echo Intensity Values Differ Significantly across Ultrasound Parameter Settings.

Scafoglieri A, Van den Broeck J, Bartocci P, Cattrysse E, Jager-Wittenaar H, Gonzalez M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38541617 PMC: 10971078. DOI: 10.3390/life14030291.