» Articles » PMID: 30026368

Fantastic Nuclear Envelope Herniations and Where to Find Them

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2018 Jul 21
PMID 30026368
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Morphological abnormalities of the bounding membranes of the nucleus have long been associated with human diseases from cancer to premature aging to neurodegeneration. Studies over the past few decades support that there are both cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g. mechanical force) that can lead to nuclear envelope 'herniations', a broad catch-all term that reveals little about the underlying molecular mechanisms that contribute to these morphological defects. While there are many genetic perturbations that could ultimately change nuclear shape, here, we focus on a subset of nuclear envelope herniations that likely arise as a consequence of disrupting physiological nuclear membrane remodeling pathways required to maintain nuclear envelope homeostasis. For example, stalling of the interphase nuclear pore complex (NPC) biogenesis pathway and/or triggering of NPC quality control mechanisms can lead to herniations in budding yeast, which are remarkably similar to those observed in human disease models of early-onset dystonia. By also examining the provenance of nuclear envelope herniations associated with emerging nuclear autophagy and nuclear egress pathways, we will provide a framework to help understand the molecular pathways that contribute to nuclear deformation.

Citing Articles

Direct binding of arsenicals to nuclear transport factors disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Lorentzon E, Lee J, Masaryk J, Keuenhof K, Karlsson N, Galipaud C bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39868121 PMC: 11761705. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.13.632748.


Seipin governs phosphatidic acid homeostasis at the inner nuclear membrane.

Romanauska A, Stankunas E, Schuldiner M, Kohler A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10486.

PMID: 39622802 PMC: 11612446. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54811-z.


Nuclear and cytoplasmic spatial protein quality control is coordinated by nuclear-vacuolar junctions and perinuclear ESCRT.

Sontag E, Morales-Polanco F, Chen J, McDermott G, Dolan P, Gestaut D Nat Cell Biol. 2023; 25(5):699-713.

PMID: 37081164 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-023-01128-6.


Nuclear envelope budding and its cellular functions.

Keuenhof K, Kohler V, Broeskamp F, Panagaki D, Speese S, Buttner S Nucleus. 2023; 14(1):2178184.

PMID: 36814098 PMC: 9980700. DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2023.2178184.


Chaperoning the nuclear envelope.

Kirstein J Nat Cell Biol. 2022; 24(11):1563-1564.

PMID: 36302972 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-022-01013-8.


References
1.
Lord C, Timney B, Rout M, Wente S . Altering nuclear pore complex function impacts longevity and mitochondrial function in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2015; 208(6):729-44. PMC: 4362458. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201412024. View

2.
von Appen A, Kosinski J, Sparks L, Ori A, DiGuilio A, Vollmer B . In situ structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex. Nature. 2015; 526(7571):140-143. PMC: 4886846. DOI: 10.1038/nature15381. View

3.
Hodge C, Choudhary V, Wolyniak M, Scarcelli J, Schneiter R, Cole C . Integral membrane proteins Brr6 and Apq12 link assembly of the nuclear pore complex to lipid homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci. 2009; 123(Pt 1):141-51. PMC: 2794714. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.055046. View

4.
Rose A, Schlieker C . Alternative nuclear transport for cellular protein quality control. Trends Cell Biol. 2012; 22(10):509-14. PMC: 3462225. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.003. View

5.
Vargas J, Hatch E, Anderson D, Hetzer M . Transient nuclear envelope rupturing during interphase in human cancer cells. Nucleus. 2012; 3(1):88-100. PMC: 3342953. DOI: 10.4161/nucl.18954. View