» Articles » PMID: 30018777

Revascularisation of Left Main Stem Disease: a Prospective Analysis of Modern Practice and Outcomes in a Non-surgical Centre

Overview
Journal Open Heart
Date 2018 Jul 19
PMID 30018777
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we sought to prospectively analyse the management and long term outcomes associated with revascularisation of left main stem disease via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in our centre.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled all patients with unprotected left main stem disease undergoing revascularisation from January 2013 to June 2014. Baseline characteristics, hospital presentation and hospital stay length were collected. Patients were followed up at 1, 2 and 3 years. Primary outcomes of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) were defined as death, Q wave myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularisation and readmission within 30 days.

Results: 56 patients with significant left main stem coronary artery disease were identified from the clinical registry. 27 patients underwent PCI (median age 67.7) and 29 CABG (median age 68.6). PCI patients had a higher surgical risk as measured by mean euroSCORE (4.95±5.8 vs 3.11±3.85). At 3 years, total MACCE occurred in 29.6% of the PCI cohort and 27.5% of the CABG cohort. Death occurred in three patients in the PCI group within the first 6 months. Death occurred in one patient in the CABG group over 2 years postprocedure. Two patients in the CABG cohort presented with Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs) at 2-year follow-up. At 3 years, revascularisation occurred in three patients in the PCI cohort. There were no revascularisation events in the CABG cohort.

Conclusions: PCI with modern drug eluting stents is a reasonable treatment option for unprotected left main stem disease in a non surgical centre.

Citing Articles

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in patients with STEMI and unprotected left main stem disease: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Almas T, Afzal A, Fatima H, Yaqoob S, Jarullah F, Abbasi Z Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022; 40:101041.

PMID: 35655530 PMC: 9152298. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101041.

References
1.
Wood F, Saylors E, Schneider J, Jobe R, Mann 3rd J . Unprotected left main disease managed with drug-eluting stents: long-term outcome of 100 patients with increased surgical risk. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 71(4):533-8. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21447. View

2.
Haan C, OBrien S, Edwards F, Peterson E, Ferguson T . Trends in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after percutaneous coronary intervention, 1994-2003. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81(5):1658-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.09.079. View

3.
Stone G, Sabik J, Serruys P, Simonton C, Genereux P, Puskas J . Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(23):2223-2235. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227. View

4.
Makikallio T, Holm N, Lindsay M, Spence M, Erglis A, Menown I . Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016; 388(10061):2743-2752. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. View

5.
Gaziano T, Bitton A, Anand S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Murphy A . Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010; 35(2):72-115. PMC: 2864143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2009.10.002. View