» Articles » PMID: 30014045

Medical Egg Freezing: How Cost and Lack of Insurance Cover Impact Women and Their Families

Overview
Date 2018 Jul 18
PMID 30014045
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Medical egg freezing (MEF) is being recommended increasingly for women at risk of losing their reproductive ability due to cancer chemotherapy or other fertility-threatening medical conditions. This first, binational, ethnographic study of women who had undergone MEF sought to explore women's experiences under two different funding systems: (i) the USA, where the cost of MEF is rarely covered by private or state health insurance; and (ii) Israel, where the cost of MEF is covered by national health insurance. Women were recruited from four American and two Israeli in-vitro fertilization clinics where MEF is offered. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 women (33 Americans, 12 Israelis) who had completed at least one cycle of MEF. All of the Israeli women had cancer diagnoses, but were not faced with the additional burden of funding an MEF cycle. In marked contrast, the American women - 23 with cancer diagnoses and 10 with other fertility-threatening medical conditions - struggled, along with their families, to 'piece together' MEF funding, which added significant financial pressure to an already stressful situation. Given the high priority that both American and Israeli women in this study placed on survival and future motherhood, it is suggested that insurance funding for MEF should be mandated in the USA, as it is in Israel. This article concludes by describing new state legislative efforts in this regard.

Citing Articles

Balancing choice and socioeconomic realities: analyzing behavioral and economic factors in social oocyte cryopreservation decisions.

Gonen L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1467213.

PMID: 39758347 PMC: 11695191. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1467213.


Assessing Attitudes and Understanding After Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: A Follow-Up Telephone Interview Survey.

Piselli A, Yano J, Gomez-Lobo V J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024; 13(4):622-628.

PMID: 38597904 PMC: 11322625. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0148.


Oocyte Cryopreservation for Medical and Planned Indications: A Practical Guide and Overview.

Han E, Seifer D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37240648 PMC: 10218997. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103542.


Social egg freezing: Motivations, treatment experiences and the impact of Covid-19 - a single-center experience.

Murugesu S, Charalambides M, Jones B, Saso S, Faris R, Parikh J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023; 102(6):760-773.

PMID: 36970993 PMC: 10201961. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14565.


Too much equity - is there such a thing? The public discourse surrounding elective egg freezing subsidy in Israel.

Birenbaum-Carmeli D Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):34.

PMID: 36803514 PMC: 9938687. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01831-8.


References
1.
Rashedi A, de Roo S, Ataman L, Edmonds M, Silva A, Scarella A . Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020; 6. PMC: 7853877. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.2016.008144. View

2.
. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2012; 99(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028. View

3.
Logan S, Perz J, Ussher J, Peate M, Anazodo A . Clinician provision of oncofertility support in cancer patients of a reproductive age: A systematic review. Psychooncology. 2017; 27(3):748-756. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4518. View

4.
Bann C, Treiman K, Squiers L, Tzeng J, Nutt S, Arvey S . Cancer Survivors' Use of Fertility Preservation. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015; 24(12):1030-7. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5160. View

5.
Banerjee R, Tsiapali E . Occurrence and recall rates of fertility discussions with young breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2015; 24(1):163-171. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2758-x. View