Testing an Online, Theory-Based Intervention to Reduce Pre-drinking Alcohol Consumption and Alcohol-Related Harm in Undergraduates: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Int J Behav Med

Publisher Informa Healthcare

Date 2018 Jul 14

PMID 30003477

Citations 6

Authors

Kim M Caudwell

Barbara A Mullan

Martin S Hagger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The present study tested the efficacy of a theory-based online intervention comprising motivational (autonomy support) and volitional (implementation intention) components to reduce pre-drinking alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm.

Method: Undergraduate students (N = 202) completed self-report measures of constructs from psychological theories, pre-drinking alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related harm at baseline and were randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions in a 2 (autonomy support: present/absent) × 2 (implementation intention: present/absent) design. Participants completed follow-up measures of all variables at 4 weeks post-intervention. All participants received national guidelines on alcohol consumption and an e-mail summary of intervention content at its conclusion. Participants also received weekly SMS messages in the 4-week post-intervention period restating content relevant to their intervention condition.

Results: Neither statistically significant main effect for either the autonomy support or implementation intention intervention components nor an interaction effect was found on the outcome measures. However, statistically significant reductions in pre-drinking alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm were observed across all groups at follow-up, when compared to baseline.

Conclusion: Reductions in outcome measures were likely related to elements common to each condition (i.e., provision of national guidelines, assessment of outcome measures, e-mail summary, and SMS messages), rather than motivational and volitional components.

Citing Articles

Women who pre-game: A study of stress and alcohol use in female collegiate predrinkers.

Ceballos N, Perrotte J, Sharma S, Awofisayo O, Callaway D, Gordon A J Am Coll Health. 2023; 73(3):856-864.

PMID: 37581956 PMC: 10867280. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2245499.

A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Pedersen E, Hummer J, Davis J, Fitzke R, Tran D, Witkiewitz K Psychol Addict Behav. 2023; 37(7):841-852.

PMID: 37053413 PMC: 10570401. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000925.

Health behavior interventions for university students measuring mental health outcomes: A scoping review.

Hutchesson M, Whatnall M, Yazin N, Fenton S, Duncan M, Kay-Lambkin F Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1063429.

PMID: 36568797 PMC: 9771454. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1063429.

The effect of forming implementation intentions on alcohol consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cooke R, McEwan H, Norman P Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022; 42(1):68-80.

PMID: 36173203 PMC: 10087331. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13553.

A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for college students: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Pedersen E, Hummer J, Davis J, Fitzke R, Christie N, Witkiewitz K Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022; 17(1):31.

PMID: 35717303 PMC: 9206220. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00314-5.

References

Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, Avishai-Yitshak A, Bryan A, Klein W . The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2016; 35(11):1178-1188. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000387. View

Alkhaldi G, Hamilton F, Lau R, Webster R, Michie S, Murray E . The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(1):e6. PMC: 4723726. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4790. View

Labhart F, Graham K, Wells S, Kuntsche E . Drinking before going to licensed premises: an event-level analysis of predrinking, alcohol consumption, and adverse outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012; 37(2):284-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01872.x. View

Kypri K, Cronin M, Wright C . Do university students drink more hazardously than their non-student peers?. Addiction. 2005; 100(5):713-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01116.x. View

Armitage C . Effectiveness of experimenter-provided and self-generated implementation intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in a sample of the general population: a randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(5):545-53. DOI: 10.1037/a0015984. View

Cox W, Klinger E . A motivational model of alcohol use. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988; 97(2):168-80. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.97.2.168. View

de Visser R, Birch J . My cup runneth over: young people's lack of knowledge of low-risk drinking guidelines. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011; 31(2):206-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00371.x. View

Wright C, Dietze P, Crockett B, Lim M . Participatory development of MIDY (Mobile Intervention for Drinking in Young people). BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:184. PMC: 4765036. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2876-5. View

Koestner R, Horberg E, Gaudreau P, Powers T, Di Dio P, Bryan C . Bolstering implementation plans for the long haul: the benefits of simultaneously boosting self-concordance or self-efficacy. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006; 32(11):1547-58. DOI: 10.1177/0146167206291782. View

10.

Barry A, Stellefson M, Piazza-Gardner A, Chaney B, Dodd V . The impact of pregaming on subsequent blood alcohol concentrations: an event-level analysis. Addict Behav. 2013; 38(8):2374-7. PMC: 3819100. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.03.014. View

11.

Bush K, Kivlahan D, McDonell M, Fihn S, Bradley K . The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158(16):1789-95. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789. View

12.

Hagger M, Chatzisarantis N . The Trans-Contextual Model of Autonomous Motivation in Education: Conceptual and Empirical Issues and Meta-Analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2016; 86(2):360-407. PMC: 4873731. DOI: 10.3102/0034654315585005. View

13.

Hallett J, Howat P, Maycock B, McManus A, Kypri K, Dhaliwal S . Undergraduate student drinking and related harms at an Australian university: web-based survey of a large random sample. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:37. PMC: 3398299. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-37. View

14.

Murgraff V, White D, Phillips K . Moderating binge drinking: it is possible to change behaviour if you plan it in advance. Alcohol Alcohol. 1996; 31(6):577-82. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008193. View

15.

Kypri K, Langley J, Saunders J, Cashell-Smith M . Assessment may conceal therapeutic benefit: findings from a randomized controlled trial for hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2007; 102(1):62-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01632.x. View

16.

Neighbors C, Larimer M, Lewis M . Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72(3):434-47. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.434. View

17.

Oei T, Morawska A . A cognitive model of binge drinking: the influence of alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy. Addict Behav. 2003; 29(1):159-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(03)00076-5. View

18.

Fortier M, Duda J, Guerin E, Teixeira P . Promoting physical activity: development and testing of self-determination theory-based interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:20. PMC: 3353256. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-20. View

19.

Ng J, Ntoumanis N, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Deci E, Ryan R, Duda J . Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 7(4):325-40. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612447309. View

20.

White A, Kavanagh D, Stallman H, Klein B, Kay-Lambkin F, Proudfoot J . Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12(5):e62. PMC: 3057310. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1479. View