» Articles » PMID: 29997472

Measuring the Complexity of Consciousness

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2018 Jul 13
PMID 29997472
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The grand quest for a scientific understanding of consciousness has given rise to many new theoretical and empirical paradigms for investigating the phenomenology of consciousness as well as clinical disorders associated to it. A major challenge in this field is to formalize computational measures that can reliably quantify global brain states from data. In particular, information-theoretic complexity measures such as integrated information have been proposed as measures of conscious awareness. This suggests a new framework to quantitatively classify states of consciousness. However, it has proven increasingly difficult to apply these complexity measures to realistic brain networks. In part, this is due to high computational costs incurred when implementing these measures on realistically large network dimensions. Nonetheless, complexity measures for quantifying states of consciousness are important for assisting clinical diagnosis and therapy. This article is meant to serve as a lookup table of measures of consciousness, with particular emphasis on clinical applicability. We consider both, principle-based complexity measures as well as empirical measures tested on patients. We address challenges facing these measures with regard to realistic brain networks, and where necessary, suggest possible resolutions.

Citing Articles

The Morphospace of Consciousness: Three Kinds of Complexity for Minds and Machines.

Arsiwalla X, Sole R, Moulin-Frier C, Herreros I, Sanchez-Fibla M, Verschure P NeuroSci. 2024; 4(2):79-102.

PMID: 39483317 PMC: 11523714. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci4020009.


What does it mean for consciousness to be multidimensional? A narrative review.

Palenik J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1430262.

PMID: 38966739 PMC: 11222411. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430262.


Consciousness and complexity: a consilience of evidence.

Sarasso S, Casali A, Casarotto S, Rosanova M, Sinigaglia C, Massimini M Neurosci Conscious. 2024; 2021(2):niab023.

PMID: 38496724 PMC: 10941977. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab023.


Complexity and 1/f slope jointly reflect brain states.

Medel V, Irani M, Crossley N, Ossandon T, Boncompte G Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21700.

PMID: 38065976 PMC: 10709649. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47316-0.


Editorial: Insights in consciousness research 2021.

Srinivasan N, Simione L, Arsiwalla X, Kleiner J, Raffone A Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1182690.

PMID: 37151321 PMC: 10157188. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182690.


References
1.
Giacino J . The vegetative and minimally conscious states: consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005; 19(4):293-8. View

2.
Tononi G . Integrated information theory of consciousness: an updated account. Arch Ital Biol. 2012; 150(2-3):56-90. DOI: 10.4449/aib.v149i5.1388. View

3.
Tononi G, Sporns O . Measuring information integration. BMC Neurosci. 2003; 4:31. PMC: 331407. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-4-31. View

4.
Balduzzi D, Tononi G . Integrated information in discrete dynamical systems: motivation and theoretical framework. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(6):e1000091. PMC: 2386970. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000091. View

5.
Schartner M, Seth A, Noirhomme Q, Boly M, Bruno M, Laureys S . Complexity of Multi-Dimensional Spontaneous EEG Decreases during Propofol Induced General Anaesthesia. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0133532. PMC: 4529106. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133532. View