» Articles » PMID: 29996925

Radiographs in Screening for Sacroiliitis in Children: What is the Value?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2018 Jul 13
PMID 29996925
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pelvic radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints in children with suspected sacroiliitis.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of children with suspected or confirmed spondyloarthritis who underwent pelvic radiograph and MRI within 6 months of one another. Images were scored independently by five raters. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss's kappa coefficient (κ). Test properties of radiographs for depiction of sacroiliitis were calculated using MRI global sacroiliitis impression as the reference standard.

Results: The interrater agreement for global impression was κ = 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.52) for radiographs and κ = 0.72 (95% CI 0.52-0.86) for MRI. Across raters, the sensitivity of radiographs ranged from 25 to 77.8% and specificity ranged from 60.8 to 92.2%. Positive and negative predictive values ranged from 25.9 to 52% and from 82.7 to 93.9%, respectively. The misclassification rate ranged from 6 to 17% for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans and from 48 to 74% for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans. When the reference standard was changed to structural lesions consistent with sacroiliitis on MRI, the misclassification rate was higher for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans (9-23%) and marginally improved for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans (33-52%).

Conclusion: Interrater reliability of MRI was superior to radiographs for global sacroiliitis impression. Misclassification for both negative and positive radiographs was high across raters. Radiographs have limited utility in screening for sacroiliitis in children and result in a significant proportion of both false negative and positive findings versus MRI findings.

Citing Articles

Axial radiographic structural damage in patients with Enthesitis-Related Arthritis presents a distinct phenotype compared to adults with axial spondyloarthritis: A cross-sectional cohort study.

de Araujo Pereira A, do Amaral E Castro A, Ahn I, Cecy Kuenzer Goes Esmanhotto P, Yui Aihara A, Irochima Pinheiro F Rheumatol Int. 2025; 45(3):54.

PMID: 39976813 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-025-05799-2.


Effect of Characteristic Inflammatory and Structural Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions on Expert Assessment of Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.

Mayer A, Brandon T, Aggarwal A, Burgos-Vargas R, Colbert R, Horneff G J Rheumatol. 2025; 52(2):165-172.

PMID: 39814440 PMC: 11788049. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0696.


Defining axial involvement in juvenile SpA.

Poddubnyy D Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024; 21(1):3-4.

PMID: 39327530 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-024-01170-0.


Imaging in pediatric spondyloarthritis.

Carol H, Chauvin N, Weiss P Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2023; 35(4):226-234.

PMID: 37067983 PMC: 10219848. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000942.


Consensus-Driven Definition for Unequivocal Sacroiliitis on Radiographs in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.

Weiss P, Brandon T, Lambert R, Biko D, Chauvin N, Francavilla M J Rheumatol. 2023; 50(9):1173-1177.

PMID: 37061228 PMC: 10524560. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-0890.


References
1.
Pagnini I, Savelli S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Fonda C, Cimaz R, Simonini G . Early predictors of juvenile sacroiliitis in enthesitis-related arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37(11):2395-401. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100090. View

2.
Weiss P, Maksymowych W, Lambert R, Jaremko J, Biko D, Paschke J . Feasibility and Reliability of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score in Children. J Rheumatol. 2018; 45(10):1411-1417. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.171329. View

3.
Blum U, Buitrago-Tellez C, Mundinger A, Krause T, Laubenberger J, Vaith P . Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of active sacroiliitis--a prospective study comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, and contrast enhanced MRI. J Rheumatol. 1996; 23(12):2107-15. View

4.
Maksymowych W, Lambert R, Brown L, Pangan A . Defining the Minimally Important Change for the SpondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada Spine and Sacroiliac Joint Magnetic Resonance Imaging Indices for Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2012; 39(8):1666-74. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120131. View

5.
Battistone M, Manaster B, Reda D, Clegg D . Radiographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis--are sacroiliac views really better?. J Rheumatol. 1998; 25(12):2395-401. View