» Articles » PMID: 29995154

Reliability, Validity, and Factorial Structure of the World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in Iranian Psychiatric Outpatients

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2018 Jul 12
PMID 29995154
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The association between psychological well-being and physical and mental health has been shown in the literature. Psychological well-being is a multifaceted concept. The World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a 5-item instrument used to screen for depression. However, the validity of the WHO-5 has not been investigated in Iranian psychiatric or psychological settings.

Objective: To investigate the validation of the Farsi version of the WHO-5 in a sample of Iranian psychiatric outpatients.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 116 Iranian volunteer psychiatric outpatients selected from the psychiatric and psychological clinics at the School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health - Tehran Institute of Psychiatry, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Patients completed the WHO-5, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), and the short form of the Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13).

Results: The mean score of the WHO-5 was 8.95 (standard deviation [SD] = 5.49). Cronbach's α for the WHO-5 was 0.91. The WHO-5 negatively correlated with PHQ-9 (-0.358), PHQ-15 (-0.328), and BDI-13 (-0.475), indicating good validity. Factor analysis of the WHO-5 items identified one factor labeled psychological well-being.

Conclusions: The WHO-5 has a single dimensional structure and acceptable psychometric parameters. The results of this study suggest that WHO-5 can be used in a clinical context in Iran.

Citing Articles

Measurement Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and Somatic Symptom Scale-8: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hybelius J, Kosic A, Salomonsson S, Wachtler C, Wallert J, Nordin S JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(11):e2446603.

PMID: 39565620 PMC: 11579800. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46603.


Is the PHQ-2 a Good Measure to Inform Providers About Patient Well-Being and Functioning? Data From the Veterans Health and Life Survey.

Reed 2nd D, Engel C, Coggeshall S, Michel M, Etingen B, Bolton R Med Care. 2024; 62(12 Suppl 1):S76-S83.

PMID: 39514499 PMC: 11548814. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002069.


A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being.

Zhang W, Balloo K, Hosein A, Medland E BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):585.

PMID: 39443963 PMC: 11515516. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.


Assessing the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization -five well-being index (WHO-5) in Filipino samples amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gallemit I, Mordeno I, Simon P, Ferolino M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):580.

PMID: 39427223 PMC: 11491023. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01941-0.


A scoping review of the research evidence of the developmental assets model in Europe.

Martin-Barrado A, Gomez-Baya D Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1407338.

PMID: 39015327 PMC: 11250090. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407338.