» Articles » PMID: 29992242

Reorganization of Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Disinhibition in Frontotemporal Dementia

Overview
Journal Brain
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Jul 12
PMID 29992242
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The distribution of pathology in frontotemporal dementia is anatomically selective, to distinct cortical regions and with differential neurodegeneration across the cortical layers. The cytoarchitecture and connectivity of cortical laminae preferentially supports frequency-specific oscillations and hierarchical information transfer between brain regions. We therefore predicted that in frontotemporal dementia, core functional deficits such as disinhibition would be associated with differences in the frequency spectrum and altered cross-frequency coupling between frontal cortical regions. We examined this hypothesis using a 'Go-NoGo' response inhibition paradigm with 18 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and 20 healthy aged-matched controls during magnetoencephalography. During Go and NoGo trials, beta desynchronization was severely attenuated in patients. Beta power was associated with increased impulsivity, as measured by the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory, a carer-based questionnaire of changes in everyday behaviour. To quantify the changes in cross-frequency coupling in the frontal lobe, we used dynamic causal modelling to test a family of hierarchical casual models, which included the inferior frontal gyrus, pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) and primary motor cortex. This analysis revealed evidence for cross-frequency coupling in a fully connected network in both groups. However, in the patient group, we identified a significant loss of reciprocal connectivity of the inferior frontal gyrus, particularly for interactions in the gamma band and for theta to alpha coupling. Importantly, although prefrontal coupling was diminished, gamma connectivity between preSMA and motor cortex was enhanced in patients. We propose that the disruption of behavioural control arises from reduced frequency-specific connectivity of the prefrontal cortex, together with a hyper-synchronous reorganization of connectivity among preSMA and motor regions. These results are supported by preclinical evidence of the selectivity of frontotemporal lobar degeneration on oscillatory dynamics, and provide a clinically relevant yet precise neurophysiological signature of behavioural control as a potential pharmacological target for early phase experimental medicines studies.

Citing Articles

Phase 2 study of palmitoylethanolamide combined with luteoline in frontotemporal dementia patients.

Assogna M, Di Lorenzo F, Bonni S, Borghi I, Cerulli Irelli E, Mencarelli L Brain Commun. 2025; 7(2):fcaf080.

PMID: 40046339 PMC: 11881584. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf080.


GABAergic modulation of beta power enhances motor adaptation in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Hughes L, Adams N, Rouse M, Naessens M, Shaw A, Murley A Alzheimers Dement. 2025; :e14531.

PMID: 39968697 PMC: 7617437. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14531.


The effect of a cognitive training therapy based on stimulation of brain oscillations in patients with mild cognitive impairment in a Chilean sample: study protocol for a phase IIb, 2 × 3 mixed factorial, double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Figueroa-Vargas A, Gongora B, Alonso M, Ortega A, Soto-Fernandez P, Z-Rivera L Trials. 2024; 25(1):144.

PMID: 38395980 PMC: 10885461. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07972-7.


A neuroanatomical and cognitive model of impaired social behaviour in frontotemporal dementia.

Rouse M, Binney R, Patterson K, Rowe J, Lambon Ralph M Brain. 2024; 147(6):1953-1966.

PMID: 38334506 PMC: 11146431. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae040.


Frontotemporal disorders: the expansive panoply of syndromes and spectrum of etiologies.

Hoffmann M, Rossi F, Benes Lima L, King C Front Neurol. 2024; 14:1305071.

PMID: 38264092 PMC: 10803619. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1305071.


References
1.
Sharma N, Baron J, Rowe J . Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol. 2009; 66(5):604-16. PMC: 3791355. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21810. View

2.
Rascovsky K, Hodges J, Knopman D, Mendez M, Kramer J, Neuhaus J . Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011; 134(Pt 9):2456-77. PMC: 3170532. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr179. View

3.
Kersaitis C, Halliday G, Kril J . Regional and cellular pathology in frontotemporal dementia: relationship to stage of disease in cases with and without Pick bodies. Acta Neuropathol. 2004; 108(6):515-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-004-0917-0. View

4.
Irwin D, Brettschneider J, McMillan C, Cooper F, Olm C, Arnold S . Deep clinical and neuropathological phenotyping of Pick disease. Ann Neurol. 2015; 79(2):272-87. PMC: 4755803. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24559. View

5.
Schnitzler A, Gross J . Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(4):285-96. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1650. View