» Articles » PMID: 29991876

Intra-individual Comparison of Therapeutic Responses to Vascular Disrupting Agent CA4P Between Rodent Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 Jul 12
PMID 29991876
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare therapeutic responses of a vascular-disrupting-agent, combretastatin-A4-phosphate (CA4P), among hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and implanted rhabdomyosarcoma (R1) in the same rats by magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI), microangiography and histopathology.

Methods: Thirty-six HCCs were created by diethylnitrosamine gavage in 14 rats that were also intrahepatically implanted with one R1 per rat as monitored by T2-/T1-weighted images (T2WI/T1WI) on a 3.0T clinical MRI-scanner. Vascular response and tumoral necrosis were detected by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) and CE-MRI before, 1 h after and 12 h after CA4P iv at 10 mg/kg (treatment group = 7) or phosphate-buffered saline at 1.0 mL/kg (control group = 7). Tumor blood supply was calculated by a semiquantitative DCE parameter of area under the time signal intensity curve (AUC30). MRI findings were verified by postmortem techniques.

Results: On CE-T1WIs, unlike the negative response in all tumors of control animals, in treatment group CA4P caused rapid extensive vascular shutdown in all R1-tumors, but mildly or spottily in HCCs at 1 h. Consequently, tumor necrosis occurred massively in R1-tumors but patchily in HCCs at 12 h. AUC30 revealed vascular closure (66%) in R1-tumors at 1 h ( < 0.05), followed by further perfusion decrease at 12 h ( < 0.01), while less significant vascular clogging occurred in HCCs. Histomorphologically, CA4P induced more extensive necrosis in R1-tumors (92.6%) than in HCCs (50.2%) ( < 0.01); tumor vascularity heterogeneously scored +~+++ in HCCs but homogeneously scored ++ in R1-tumors.

Conclusion: This study suggests superior performance of CA4P in metastatic over primary liver cancers, which could guide future clinical applications of vascular-disrupting-agents.​.

Citing Articles

Treatment Effect of a Vascular-Disrupting Agent Dynamically Monitored by DWI: An Animal Experimental Study.

Huang D, Yang R, Zou Y, Lin H, Xu X, Wei X Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 2021:2909189.

PMID: 35004528 PMC: 8739180. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2909189.


Monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of CA4P in the rabbit VX2 liver tumor using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Han T, Duan Q, Yang R, Wang Y, Yin H, Meng F Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021; 27(5):587-594.

PMID: 34559047 PMC: 8480957. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2021.20010.


Non-Invasive Evaluation of Acute Effects of Tubulin Binding Agents: A Review of Imaging Vascular Disruption in Tumors.

Liu L, OKelly D, Schuetze R, Carlson G, Zhou H, Trawick M Molecules. 2021; 26(9).

PMID: 33925707 PMC: 8125421. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092551.


Predicting Clinical Efficacy of Vascular Disrupting Agents in Rodent Models of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers: An Overview with Imaging-Histopathology Correlation.

Liu Y, Wang S, Zhao X, Feng Y, Bormans G, Swinnen J Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(2).

PMID: 32024029 PMC: 7168934. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10020078.


Predicting Therapeutic Efficacy of Vascular Disrupting Agent CA4P in Rats with Liver Tumors by Hepatobiliary Contrast Agent Mn-DPDP-Enhanced MRI.

Liu Y, Guan Q, Kong X, De Keyzer F, Feng Y, Chen F Transl Oncol. 2019; 13(1):92-101.

PMID: 31810003 PMC: 6909075. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.09.010.

References
1.
Zweifel M, Jayson G, Reed N, Osborne R, Hassan B, Ledermann J . Phase II trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22(9):2036-2041. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq708. View

2.
Maier K . [Cirrhosis of the liver as a precancerous condition]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998; 87(44):1462-5. View

3.
Wu X, Ma W, Gurung K, Guo C . Mechanisms of tumor resistance to small-molecule vascular disrupting agents: treatment and rationale of combination therapy. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013; 112(3):115-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.09.017. View

4.
Ni Y, Marchal G, Yu J, Muhler A, Lukito G, Baert A . Prolonged positive contrast enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA in experimental liver tumors: potential value in tissue characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994; 4(3):355-63. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880040322. View

5.
He X, Li S, Huang H, Li Z, Chen L, Ye S . A pharmacokinetic and safety study of single dose intravenous combretastatin A4 phosphate in Chinese patients with refractory solid tumours. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 71(6):860-70. PMC: 3099373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03928.x. View