» Articles » PMID: 29991445

Decoding Selective Attention to Context Memory: An Aging Study

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Jul 12
PMID 29991445
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emerging evidence has suggested that the tendency for older adults to bind too much contextual information during encoding (i.e., hyper-binding) may contribute to poorer memory for relevant contextual information during retrieval. While these findings are consistent with theories of age-related declines in selective attention and inhibitory control, the degree to which older adults are able to selectively attend to relevant contextual information during encoding is unknown. To better understand the neural dynamics associated with selective attention during encoding, the current study applied multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA) to oscillatory EEG in order to track moment-to-moment shifts of attention between relevant and irrelevant contextual information during encoding. Young and older adults studied pictures of objects in the presence of two contextual features: a color and a scene, and their attention was directed to the object's relationship with one of those contexts (i.e., target context). Results showed that patterns of oscillatory power successfully predicted whether selective attention was directed to a scene or color, across age groups. Individual differences in overall classification performance were associated with individual differences in target context memory accuracy during retrieval. However, changes in classification performance within a trial, suggestive of fluctuations in selective attention, predicted individual differences in hyper-binding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use MPVA techniques to decode attention during episodic encoding and the impact of attentional shifts toward distracting information on age-related context memory impairments and hyper-binding. These results are consistent with the as-of-yet unsubstantiated theory that age-related declines in context memory may be attributable to poorer selective attention and/or greater inhibitory deficits in older adults.

Citing Articles

Top-down attention and Alzheimer's pathology impact cortical selectivity during learning, influencing episodic memory in older adults.

Sheng J, Trelle A, Romero A, Park J, Tran T, Sha S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39713293 PMC: 11661099. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.04.626911.


Hyper-Binding: Older Adults Form Too Many Associations, Not Too Few.

Campbell K, Davis E Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2024; 33(5):292-299.

PMID: 39493580 PMC: 11530341. DOI: 10.1177/09637214241263020.


Some young adults hyper-bind too: Attentional control relates to individual differences in hyper-binding.

Davis E, Tehrani E, Campbell K Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(4):1809-1820.

PMID: 38302792 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02464-w.


Neural reinstatement of context memory in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Justus S, Mirjalili S, Powell P, Duarte A Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(13):8546-8556.

PMID: 37106572 PMC: 10321090. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad139.


Preservation of long-term memory in older adults using a spaced learning paradigm.

Caffrey M, Commins S Eur J Ageing. 2023; 20(1):2.

PMID: 36723694 PMC: 9892402. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-023-00750-5.


References
1.
Spencer W, Raz N . Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 1995; 10(4):527-39. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.10.4.527. View

2.
Nuwer M, Comi G, Emerson R, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Guerit J, Hinrichs H . IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 106(3):259-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00106-5. View

3.
Kuo T, Van Petten C . Prefrontal engagement during source memory retrieval depends on the prior encoding task. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(7):1133-46. PMC: 2507728. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1133. View

4.
Campbell K, Grady C, Ng C, Hasher L . Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: implications for distractibility. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(9):2212-23. PMC: 4898951. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.025. View

5.
Gazzaley A, Cooney J, Rissman J, DEsposito M . Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(10):1298-300. DOI: 10.1038/nn1543. View