» Articles » PMID: 29990334

SeRUN® Study: Development of Running Profiles Using a Mixed Methods Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Jul 11
PMID 29990334
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine profiles of urban runners based on socio-demographic, health, motivational, training characteristics and running-related beliefs and behaviours.

Methods: Mixed, exploratory, sequential study with two stages: 1) quantitative, using an online survey; and 2) qualitative, using semi-structured interviews with runners from the previous stage. Participants were recruited via: running routes commonly attended by runners, eight races, previous databases and social media networks. The survey collected information on six dimensions: (1) socio-demographic; (2) health; (3) motivations; (4) training characteristics; (5) running-related behaviour; and (6) beliefs and perceptions about health. Profiles were identified using a two-step hierarchical clustering analysis. Subsequently, 15 interviews were conducted with participating runners across each of the identified profiles. Qualitative analysis complemented the profiles characterization, explaining motivations to start and continue running, beliefs about risk factors and injury prevention, and the physical therapist's role in rehabilitation. Statistical analysis from stage one was conducted using SPSS 22 with a confidence level of 5%. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic and content analyses.

Results: A total of 821 surveys were analysed (46% female), mean aged 36.6±10.0 years. Cluster analysis delineated four profiles (n = 752) according to years of running experience, weekly running volume and hours of weekly training. Profiles were named "Beginner" (n = 163); "Basic" (n = 164); "Middle" (n = 160) and "Advanced" (n = 265). Profiles were statistically different according to sex, age, years of running experience, training characteristics, previous injuries and use of technological devices (p<0.05). There were identified motivations to start and continue running. Beliefs about risk factors vary among stretching, footwear, training surface and overload. Runners identified the physical therapist as a specialist, involved in the rehabilitation process and showing empathy towards the patient. The identification of these profiles allows the generation of future prospective studies and clinical trials to evaluate risk and prognostic factors targeting specific populations of runners, with the ultimate aim of reducing running-related injury.

Citing Articles

Definitions and surveillance methods of running-related injuries: A scoping review.

Lacey A, Whyte E, Dillon S, OConnor S, Burke A, Moran K Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(7):950-963.

PMID: 38956793 PMC: 11235823. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12123.


Differences in training characteristics of recreational endurance runners by race distance - results from the NURMI Study (Step 2).

Knechtle B, Tanous D, Thuany M, Motevalli M, Wirnitzer G, Leitzmann C Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1269374.

PMID: 38264416 PMC: 10805148. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1269374.


The Running Injury Continuum: A qualitative examination of recreational runners' description and management of injury.

Lacey A, Whyte E, OKeeffe S, OConnor S, Burke A, Moran K PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292369.

PMID: 37792711 PMC: 10550191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292369.


Domesticating the condition: Design lessons gained from a marathon on how to cope with barriers imposed by type 1 diabetes.

Montt-Blanchard D, Dubois-Camacho K, Costa-Cordella S, Sanchez R Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1013877.

PMID: 36420398 PMC: 9677098. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013877.


Going their own way-male recreational runners and running-related injuries: A qualitative thematic analysis.

Peterson B, Searle A, Spink M, Hawke F, Callister R, Chuter V PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273401.

PMID: 36006999 PMC: 9409521. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273401.


References
1.
Yeung E, Yeung S . A systematic review of interventions to prevent lower limb soft tissue running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2001; 35(6):383-9. PMC: 1724431. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.35.6.383. View

2.
Vatcheva K, Lee M, McCormick J, Rahbar M . Multicollinearity in Regression Analyses Conducted in Epidemiologic Studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2016; 6(2). PMC: 4888898. DOI: 10.4172/2161-1165.1000227. View

3.
Gallant J, Pierrynowski M . A theoretical perspective on running-related injuries. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014; 104(2):211-20. DOI: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.211. View

4.
Nigg B, Baltich J, Hoerzer S, Enders H . Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: 'preferred movement path' and 'comfort filter'. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49(20):1290-4. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095054. View

5.
Nielsen R, Bertelsen M, Parner E, Sorensen H, Lind M, Rasmussen S . Running more than three kilometers during the first week of a running regimen may be associated with increased risk of injury in obese novice runners. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(3):338-45. PMC: 4060311. View