» Articles » PMID: 29987421

Follow-up Infarct Volume As a Mediator of Endovascular Treatment Effect on Functional Outcome in Ischaemic Stroke

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Jul 11
PMID 29987421
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The putative mechanism for the favourable effect of endovascular treatment (EVT) on functional outcome after acute ischaemic stroke is preventing follow-up infarct volume (FIV) progression. We aimed to assess to what extent difference in FIV explains the effect of EVT on functional outcome in a randomised trial of EVT versus no EVT (MR CLEAN).

Methods: FIV was assessed on non-contrast CT scan 5-7 days after stroke. Functional outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. We tested the causal pathway from intervention, via FIV to functional outcome with a mediation model, using linear and ordinal regression, adjusted for relevant baseline covariates, including stroke severity. Explained effect was assessed by taking the ratio of the log odds ratios of treatment with and without adjustment for FIV.

Results: Of the 500 patients included in MR CLEAN, 60 died and four patients underwent hemicraniectomy before FIV was assessed, leaving 436 patients for analysis. Patients in the intervention group had better functional outcomes (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) 2.30 (95% CI 1.62-3.26) than controls and smaller FIV (median 53 vs. 81 ml) (difference 28 ml; 95% CI 13-41). Smaller FIV was associated with better outcome (acOR per 10 ml 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.68). After adjustment for FIV the effect of intervention on functional outcome decreased but remained substantial (acOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.44-2.91). This implies that preventing FIV progression explains 14% (95% CI 0-34) of the beneficial effect of EVT on outcome.

Conclusion: The effect of EVT on FIV explains only part of the treatment effect on functional outcome.

Key Points: • Endovascular treatment in acute ischaemic stroke patients prevents progression of follow-up infarct volume on non-contrast CT at 5-7 days. • Follow-up infarct volume was related to functional outcome, but only explained a modest part of the effect of intervention on functional outcome. • A large proportion of treatment effect on functional outcome remains unexplained, suggesting FIV alone cannot be used as an early surrogate imaging marker of functional outcome.

Citing Articles

Infarct density defined by ADC threshold is associated with long-term functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy.

Favilla C, Patel H, Abassi M, Thon J, Mullen M, Kasner S J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024; 33(10):107857.

PMID: 38997048 PMC: 11380574. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107857.


Introducing the Futile Recanalization Prediction Score (FRPS): A Novel Approach to Predict and Mitigate Ineffective Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Shen H, Huasen B, Killingsworth M, Bhaskar S Neurol Int. 2024; 16(3):605-619.

PMID: 38921949 PMC: 11206671. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16030045.


Effect of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke on Cognitive Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of the ESCAPE Trial.

Joundi R, Smith E, Mandzia J, Ganesh A, Menon B, Rempel J Neurology. 2024; 102(10):e209270.

PMID: 38739880 PMC: 11177593. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209270.


Priorities for Advancements in Neuroimaging in the Diagnostic Workup of Acute Stroke.

Samaniego E, Boltze J, Lyden P, Hill M, Campbell B, Silva G Stroke. 2023; 54(12):3190-3201.

PMID: 37942645 PMC: 10841844. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044985.


Duration of Ischemia Affects Outcomes Independent of Infarct Size in Stroke.

Kim Y, Khose S, Zaidat O, Hassan A, Fifi J, Nanda A Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2023; 2(5).

PMID: 37377482 PMC: 10296784. DOI: 10.1161/svin.121.000163.


References
1.
Al-Ajlan F, Al Sultan A, Minhas P, Assis Z, De Miquel M, Millan M . Posttreatment Infarct Volumes when Compared with 24-Hour and 90-Day Clinical Outcomes: Insights from the REVASCAT Randomized Controlled Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 39(1):107-110. PMC: 7410691. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5463. View

2.
Marcoux F, Morawetz R, CROWELL R, DeGirolami U, Halsey Jr J . Differential regional vulnerability in transient focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1982; 13(3):339-46. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.13.3.339. View

3.
Saver J, JOHNSTON K, Homer D, Wityk R, Koroshetz W, Truskowski L . Infarct volume as a surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure in ischemic stroke clinical trials. The RANTTAS Investigators. Stroke. 1999; 30(2):293-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.30.2.293. View

4.
Freedman L, Graubard B, Schatzkin A . Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Stat Med. 1992; 11(2):167-78. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780110204. View

5.
Lansberg M, OBrien M, Tong D, Moseley M, Albers G . Evolution of cerebral infarct volume assessed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58(4):613-7. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.58.4.613. View