» Articles » PMID: 29986682

Coronal and Sagittal Balance in Lenke 5 AIS Patients Following Posterior Fusion: Important Role of the Lowest Instrument Vertebrae Selection

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2018 Jul 11
PMID 29986682
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lenke 5 AIS is a kind of three-dimensional deformity and literature reported it usually accompany with coronal or/and sagittal imbalance. However, the postoperative coronal and sagittal balance in these patients has rarely be analyzed previously and the predict factors for postoperative trunk balance are still unclear. To synthetically analysis coronal and sagittal balance of Lenke 5 AIS patients simultaneously and found out predict factors for postoperative coronal or/and sagittal imbalance.

Methods: Fifty-six Lenke 5 AIS patients who underwent posterior surgery and be followed up more than 2 years were included in this study. Coronal parameters included main curve Cobb angle, lumbosacral hemi-curve Cobb angle, preoperative LEV/LIV tilt and translation and C7-CSVL distance; While sagittal parameters included pelvic incidence(PI), sacral slope(SS), pelvic tilt(PT), lumbar lordosis(LL), thoracic kyphosis(TK), and sagittal vertical axis(SVA). Coronal imbalance was defined as C7-CSVL> 20 mm, and sagittal imbalance defined as (1) SVA > 40 mm or (2) PT < 20% PI/2 or PT > 20° or (3) PI-LL > 10°. And relative parameters were compared between balance and imbalance group to find out predict factors.

Results: All seven final coronal imbalance patients occurred in LIV = L5 group. Preoperative LIV tilt(11.4°) and translation(5.2 mm) in coronal imbalance group were abnormally lower than balance group (21.7° and 15.7 mm respectively). Eighteen patients performed final sagittal imbalance. The PI in these patients (37.7°) was significantly lower than balance group (48.0°). And most of finial sagittal imbalance patients also occurred in LIV = L5 group.

Conclusions: LIV = L5 as a threshold point, represents higher risk of postoperative coronal and/or sagittal imbalance. Besides, large LEV-S1 curve in reduce-bending film and small PI is directly related to final coronal imbalance and sagittal imbalance respectively.

Citing Articles

Comparison of en-bloc direct vertebrae rotation and non-direct vertebrae rotation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C: a retrospective study in Changsha, China.

Alonge E, Zhang H, Liu S, Wang Y Asian Spine J. 2025; 18(6):803-812.

PMID: 39763356 PMC: 11711168. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0318.


Do low-density screws influence pelvic incidence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction?.

Sultan A, El Nawawy W, Dawood M, Koptan W, Elmiligui Y, Barakat A J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024; 15(3):315-320.

PMID: 39483834 PMC: 11524548. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_52_24.


Lowest Instrumented Vertebra at L3 Versus L4 in Posterior Fusion for Moderate Lenke 5C Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Match Radiological Study.

Li Z, Du Y, Zhao Y, Lin G, Zhang H, Li C Neurospine. 2024; 20(4):1380-1388.

PMID: 38171304 PMC: 10762403. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346822.411.


Clinical differences in preoperative symptoms and surgical outcomes between early and late-teen patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Banno T, Yamato Y, Oba H, Ohba T, Hasegawa T, Yoshida G Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(7):2541-2549.

PMID: 37209208 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07758-6.


How to make a more optimal surgical plan for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a comparative study based on the changes of the sagittal alignment and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra.

Li J, Lin Z, Ma Y, Li W, Yu M J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):224.

PMID: 36944979 PMC: 10032010. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03680-1.


References
1.
La Maida G, Zottarelli L, Mineo G, Misaggi B . Sagittal balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic study of spino-pelvic compensation after surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22 Suppl 6:S859-67. PMC: 3830044. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3018-8. View

2.
Roberts S, Tsirikos A, Subramanian A . Posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: clinical outcomes and predictive radiological factors for extension of fusion distal to caudal end vertebra. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(8):1082-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33837. View

3.
Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P . Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(9):1459-67. PMC: 2200735. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6. View

4.
Puno R, An K, Puno R, Jacob A, Chung S . Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(18):2102-14. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000088480.08179.35. View

5.
Lenke L, Betz R, Harms J, Bridwell K, Clements D, Lowe T . Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(8):1169-81. View