» Articles » PMID: 29984547

Rectal Cancer Patients Younger Than 50 Years Lack a Survival Benefit from NCCN Guideline-directed Treatment for Stage II and III Disease

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jul 10
PMID 29984547
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The incidence of rectal cancer in patients younger than 50 years is increasing. To test the hypothesis that the biology in this younger cohort may differ, this study compared survival patterns, stratifying patients according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-driven care and age.

Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients treated with curative-intent transabdominal resections with negative surgical margins for stage I to III rectal cancer between 2004 and 2014. Outcomes and overall survival for patients younger than 50 years and patients 50 years old or older were compared by subgroups based on NCCN guideline-driven care.

Results: A total of 43,106 patients were analyzed. Younger patients were more likely to be female and minorities, to be diagnosed at a higher stage, and to have travelled further to be treated at academic/integrated centers. Short- and long-term outcomes were significantly better for patients younger than 50 years, with age-specific survival rates calculated. Younger patients were more likely to receive radiation treatment outside NCCN guidelines for stage I disease. In younger patients, the administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for stage II and III disease was not associated with an overall survival benefit.

Conclusions: Age-specific survival data for patients with rectal cancer treated with curative intent do not support an overall survival benefit from NCCN guideline-driven therapy for stage II and III patients younger than 50 years. These data suggest that early-onset disease may differ biologically and in its response to multimodality therapy.

Citing Articles

Mutational and co-mutational landscape of early onset colorectal cancer.

Alshenaifi J, Vetere G, Maddalena G, Yousef M, White M, Shen J Biomarkers. 2025; 30(1):64-76.

PMID: 39761813 PMC: 11856746. DOI: 10.1080/1354750X.2024.2447089.


Is early-onset colorectal cancer an evolving pandemic? Real-world data from a tertiary cancer center.

Angelakas A, Christodoulou T, Kamposioras K, Barriuso J, Braun M, Hasan J Oncologist. 2024; 29(12):e1680-e1691.

PMID: 39359067 PMC: 11630742. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae239.


Nomogram model for predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer: a competing risk analysis insight from the SEER database and an external validation cohort.

Fu X, Chen Y, Fan Z, Wang W, Wang Z, Yin H Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(4):1665-1684.

PMID: 38737689 PMC: 11082664. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-2023.


Symptom Burden and Time from Symptom Onset to Cancer Diagnosis in Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Baronas V, Arif A, Bhang E, Ladua G, Brown C, Donnellan F Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(4):2133-2144.

PMID: 38668061 PMC: 11049268. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040158.


Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer in the FOWARC trial.

Cai J, Lin K, Luo T, Weng J, Liu H, Yuan Z Br J Cancer. 2024; 130(9):1434-1440.

PMID: 38472421 PMC: 11058860. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02652-4.


References
1.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rates in Adults Aged 20 to 54 Years in the United States, 1970-2014. JAMA. 2017; 318(6):572-574. PMC: 5817468. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7630. View

2.
Boland C . Clinical uses of microsatellite instability testing in colorectal cancer: an ongoing challenge. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(7):754-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.4607. View

3.
Mohiuddin M, Marks J, Marks G . Management of rectal cancer: short- vs. long-course preoperative radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72(3):636-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.069. View

4.
Schiphorst A, Verweij N, Pronk A, Hamaker M . Age-related guideline adherence and outcome in low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57(8):967-75. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000145. View

5.
Monson J, Probst C, Wexner S, Remzi F, Fleshman J, Garcia-Aguilar J . Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: the association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann Surg. 2014; 260(4):625-31. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000928. View