» Articles » PMID: 29982876

Pocket-size Ultrasound Device in Cholelithiasis: Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Short-term Training

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Jul 9
PMID 29982876
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pocket-size ultrasound devices (PSUD) are now widely available becoming a useful tool for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. We aim to investigate the accuracy of PSUD in diagnosing cholelithiasis as compared to traditional ultrasonography. Moreover, we tested the reliability of PSUD when performed by inexperienced internal medicine residents after a short-term training. We consecutively enrolled inpatients and outpatients referred to undergo abdominal ultrasonography for signs or symptoms of gallbladder diseases in two different hospitals. Every patient underwent two independent examinations with PSUD by both expert (EXP) and nonexpert operators (N-EXP), and a conventional examination with traditional abdominal ultrasound (AUS). Every naive operator underwent a short-term training with a 2-h theoretical lesson, and a practical training focused on gallbladder under expert operator supervision. Overall, 146 patients were consecutively enrolled. Considering conventional AUS as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of EXP were, respectively, 93.75 and 100%. Sensitivity and specificity of N-EXP were, respectively, 75 and 91.25%. Nevertheless, when considering outpatients, PSUD has a high diagnostic accuracy even when performed by N-EXP with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%. PSUD is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of cholelithiasis when used by expert operators potentially reducing the need for further diagnostic tests. It can even be successfully used by non-expert operators in outpatients setting after a short focussed training.

Citing Articles

Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography.

Merkel D, Lueders C, Schneider C, Yousefzada M, Ruppert J, Weimer A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272698 PMC: 11393954. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171913.


Technical assessment of resolution of handheld ultrasound devices and clinical implications.

Herzog M, Arsova M, Matthes K, Husman J, Toppe D, Kober J Ultraschall Med. 2024; 45(4):405-411.

PMID: 38428463 PMC: 11293899. DOI: 10.1055/a-2243-9767.


Inter-System Variability of Eight Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices-A Prospective Comparison of B-Scan Quality and Clinical Significance in Intensive Care.

Weimer J, Beer D, Schneider C, Yousefzada M, Gottwald M, Zullich T Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38201363 PMC: 10795594. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010054.


The Performance Characteristics of Handheld, Non-Piezoelectric Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Emergency Department.

Wubben B, Yun H Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38201326 PMC: 10795712. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010017.


Prospective Comparison of Handheld Ultrasound Devices from Different Manufacturers with Respect to B-Scan Quality and Clinical Significance for Various Abdominal Sonography Questions.

Merkel D, Zullich T, Schneider C, Yousefzada M, Beer D, Ludwig M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(24).

PMID: 38132206 PMC: 10742722. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13243622.


References
1.
Stock K, Klein B, Steubl D, Lersch C, Heemann U, Wagenpfeil S . Comparison of a pocket-size ultrasound device with a premium ultrasound machine: diagnostic value and time required in bedside ultrasound examination. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(7):2861-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0406-z. View

2.
Andersen G, Viset A, Mjolstad O, Salvesen O, Dalen H, Haugen B . Feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care pocket-size ultrasonography performed by medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14:156. PMC: 4131775. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-156. View

3.
Carroll P, Gibson D, El-Faedy O, Dunne C, Coffey C, Hannigan A . Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2012; 205(1):102-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.017. View

4.
Stinton L, Shaffer E . Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 2012; 6(2):172-87. PMC: 3343155. DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172. View

5.
Aerts R, Penninckx F . The burden of gallstone disease in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 18 Suppl 3:49-53. DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-0673.2003.01721.x. View