» Articles » PMID: 29982201

Care Pathway and Organisational Features Driving Patient Experience: Statistical Analysis of Large NHS Datasets

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Jul 9
PMID 29982201
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the care pathway and organisational factors that predict patient experience.

Design: Statistical analysis of large National Health Service (NHS) datasets.

Setting Andparticipants: England; acute NHS organisational-level data.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: The relationship of care pathway and organisational variables to organisation-level patient experience.

Results: A framework of 18 care pathway and organisational variables were created based on the existing literature. 11 of these correlated to patient experience in univariate analyses. Multicollinearity tests resulted in 1 of the 11 variables holding a correlation to another variable larger than r=0.70. A significant multilinear regression equation, including the final 10 variables, was found (F(10,108)=6.214, p<0.00), with an [Formula: see text] of 0.365. Two variables were significant in predicting better in patient experience: Amount of support to clinical staff (beta=0.2, p=0.02) and the proportion of staff who would recommend the trust as a place to work or receive treatment (beta=0.26, p=0.01). Two variables were significant in predicting a negative impact on the patient's rating of their experience: Number of patients spending over 4 hours from decision to admit to admission (beta=-1.99, p=0.03) and the percentage of estates and hotel services contracted out (beta=-0.23, p=0.01).

Conclusions: These results indicate that augmenting clinical support and investing in the mechanisms that facilitate positive staff experience is essential to delivering appropriate, informative and patient-centric care. Reducing wait times and the extent of external contracting within hospitals is also likely to improve patient ratings of experience. Understanding the relationship between patient experience and objective, measurable organisational features promote a more patient-centric interpretation of quality and compel a better use of patient experience feedback to drive improvement.

Citing Articles

Enhancing primary care through integrated care pathways: a convergence of theory and practice.

Jerjes W, Harding D Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1432901.

PMID: 39726896 PMC: 11669714. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1432901.


Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Antonopoulou V, Meyer C, Chadwick P, Gibson B, Sniehotta F, Vlaev I Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):137.

PMID: 39354470 PMC: 11443808. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01209-4.


Factors influencing patient experience in hospital wards: a systematic review.

Guan T, Chen X, Li J, Zhang Y BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):527.

PMID: 39090643 PMC: 11295641. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02054-0.


The Impact of Patient Experience on Loyalty in the Context of Medical-Aesthetic Health Services.

Brandao A, Ribeiro L J Patient Exp. 2023; 10:23743735231160422.

PMID: 37026115 PMC: 10071194. DOI: 10.1177/23743735231160422.


A reflection on an adapted approach from face-to-face to telephone consultations in our Urology Outpatient Department during the COVID-19 pandemic - a pathway for change to future practice?.

Patel S, Douglas-Moore J BJU Int. 2020; 126(3):339-341.

PMID: 32469096 PMC: 7283724. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15119.


References
1.
Doyle C, Reed J, Woodcock T, Bell D . Understanding what matters to patients - identifying key patients' perceptions of quality. JRSM Short Rep. 2010; 1(1):3. PMC: 2984338. DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2009.100028. View

2.
Groene O, Lombarts M, Klazinga N, Alonso J, Thompson A, Sunol R . Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study). Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18 Suppl 1:i44-50. PMC: 2629879. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029397. View

3.
Pinder R, Ferguson J, Moller H . Minority ethnicity patient satisfaction and experience: results of the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(6):e011938. PMC: 4932347. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011938. View

4.
Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L, Roberts J, Clay D, Seers K . The Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014; 26(2):151-7. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu003. View

5.
Davies E, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S, Safran D, Oftedahl G, Sakowski J . Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS survey to support improvements in patient-centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative. Health Expect. 2008; 11(2):160-76. PMC: 5060434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00483.x. View