» Articles » PMID: 29980499

The Impact of Patient Online Access to Computerized Medical Records and Services on Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2018 Jul 8
PMID 29980499
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Online access to computerized medical records has the potential to improve convenience, satisfaction, and care for patients, and to facilitate more efficient organization and delivery of care.

Objective: The objective of this review is to explore the use and impact of having online access to computerized medical records and services for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care.

Methods: Multiple international databases including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched between 2004 and 2016. No limitations were placed on study design, though we applied detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria to each study. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the evidence. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Toolkit was used to appraise study quality.

Results: A search identified 917 studies, of which 28 were included. Five themes were identified: (1) disparities in uptake by age, gender, ethnicity, educational attainment, and number of comorbidities, with young men in full-time employment using these services most; (2) improved health outcomes: glycemic control was improved, but blood pressure results were mixed; (3) self-management support from improved self-care and shared management occurred especially soon after diagnosis and when complications emerged. There was a generally positive effect on physician-patient relationships; (4) accessibility: patients valued more convenient access when online access to computerized medical records and services work; and (5) technical challenges, barriers to use, and system features that impacted patient and physician use. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Toolkit rated 3 studies as 100%, 19 studies as 75%, 4 studies as 50%, and 1 study scored only 25%.

Conclusions: Patients valued online access to computerized medical records and services, although in its current state of development it may increase disparities. Online access to computerized medical records appears to be safe and is associated with improved glycemic control, but there was a lack of rigorous evidence in terms of positive health outcomes for other complications, such as blood pressure. Patients remain concerned about how these systems work, the rules, and timeliness of using these systems.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of the effect of personal health records on patient activation.

Osovskaya I, Blandford A, Potts H Digit Health. 2025; 11():20552076251315295.

PMID: 39845521 PMC: 11752559. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251315295.


The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews.

Ramachandran M, Brinton C, Wiljer D, Upshur R, Gray C BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):228.

PMID: 37919688 PMC: 10623772. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02176-5.


An Assessment of Patient Portal Messaging Use by Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions Living in Rural Communities: Retrospective Analysis.

Chivela F, Burch A, Asagbra O J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e44399.

PMID: 37526967 PMC: 10427930. DOI: 10.2196/44399.


Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care.

Turner A, Morris R, McDonagh L, Hamilton F, Blake S, Farr M Br J Gen Pract. 2022; 73(726):e67-e74.

PMID: 36316163 PMC: 9639599. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0720.


Development and Validation of a Useful Taxonomy of Patient Portals Based on Characteristics of Patient Engagement.

Gloggler M, Ammenwerth E Methods Inf Med. 2021; 60(S 01):e44-e55.

PMID: 34243191 PMC: 8294937. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730284.


References
1.
Flynn D, Gregory P, Makki H, Gabbay M . Expectations and experiences of eHealth in primary care: a qualitative practice-based investigation. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(9):588-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.008. View

2.
Bredfeldt C, Compton-Phillips A, Snyder M . Effects of between visit physician-patient communication on Diabetes Recognition Program scores. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011; 23(6):664-73. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr061. View

3.
Sarkar U, Karter A, Liu J, Adler N, Nguyen R, Lopez A . The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun. 2010; 15 Suppl 2:183-96. PMC: 3014858. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499988. View

4.
Honeyman A, Cox B, Fisher B . Potential impacts of patient access to their electronic care records. Inform Prim Care. 2005; 13(1):55-60. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v13i1.579. View

5.
Harris L, Koepsell T, Haneuse S, Martin D, Ralston J . Glycemic control associated with secure patient-provider messaging within a shared electronic medical record: a longitudinal analysis. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(9):2726-33. PMC: 3747898. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2003. View