» Articles » PMID: 29978368

Predicting Post Neoadjuvant Axillary Response Using a Novel Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jul 7
PMID 29978368
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: In the postneoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting, conventional radiographic complete response (rCR) is a poor predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) of the axilla. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm to better predict post-NAC axillary response using a breast MRI dataset.

Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective study from January 2009 to June 2016 identified 127 breast cancer patients who: (1) underwent breast MRI before the initiation of NAC; (2) successfully completed Adriamycin/Taxane-based NAC; and (3) underwent surgery, including sentinel lymph node evaluation/axillary lymph node dissection with final surgical pathology data. Patients were classified into pathologic complete response (pCR) of the axilla group and non-pCR group based on surgical pathology. Breast MRI performed before NAC was used. Tumor was identified on first T1 postcontrast images underwent 3D segmentation. A total of 2811 volumetric slices of 127 tumors were evaluated. CNN consisted of 10 convolutional layers, 4 max-pooling layers. Dropout, augmentation and L2 regularization were implemented to prevent overfitting of data.

Results: On final surgical pathology, 38.6% (49/127) of the patients achieved pCR of the axilla (group 1), and 61.4% (78/127) of the patients did not with residual metastasis detected (group 2). For predicting axillary pCR, our CNN algorithm achieved an overall accuracy of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 5) with sensitivity of 93% (95% CI ± 6) and specificity of 77% (95% CI ± 4). Area under the ROC curve (0.93, 95% CI ± 0.04).

Conclusions: It is feasible to use CNN architecture to predict post NAC axillary pCR. Larger data set will likely improve our prediction model.

Citing Articles

Axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: from historical axillary surgery to updated advances in the preoperative diagnosis and axillary management.

Wu T, Long Q, Zeng L, Zhu J, Gao H, Deng Y BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):81.

PMID: 40016717 PMC: 11869450. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02802-2.


Machine learning approaches in the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes post neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI, CT, or ultrasound: A systematic review.

Yaghoobpoor S, Fathi M, Ghorani H, Valizadeh P, Jannatdoust P, Tavasol A Eur J Radiol Open. 2024; 12:100561.

PMID: 38699592 PMC: 11063585. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100561.


AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.

Gullo R, Brunekreef J, Marcus E, Han L, Eskreis-Winkler S, Thakur S J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 60(6):2290-2308.

PMID: 38581127 PMC: 11452568. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29358.


Role of Nuclear Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Compared to New Alternative Imaging Methods.

Cuccurullo V, Rapa M, Catalfamo B, Cascini G J Pers Med. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37623469 PMC: 10455335. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081219.


Deep Learning Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Using MRI and Other Clinical Data: A Systematic Review.

Khan N, Adam R, Huang P, Maldjian T, Duong T Tomography. 2022; 8(6):2784-2795.

PMID: 36412691 PMC: 9680498. DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060232.