Smart Scaffolds in Tissue Regeneration

Overview

Journal Regen Biomater

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2018 Jul 7

PMID 29977595

Citations 27

Authors

Samad Ahadian

Ali Khademhosseini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Recent advances in biofabrication technologies and chemical synthesis approaches have enabled the fabrication of smart scaffolds that aim to mimic the dynamic nature of the native extracellular matrix. These scaffolds have paved the way for tissue regeneration in a dynamic and controllable manner.

Citing Articles

3D Printing in Wound Healing: Innovations, Applications, and Future Directions.

Sachdeo R, Khanwelkar C, Shete A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75331.

PMID: 39776700 PMC: 11706447. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75331.

4D Printing of Multifunctional and Biodegradable PLA-PBAT-FeO Nanocomposites with Supreme Mechanical and Shape Memory Properties.

Yousefi M, Rahmatabadi D, Baniassadi M, Bodaghi M, Baghani M Macromol Rapid Commun. 2024; 46(2):e2400661.

PMID: 39401289 PMC: 11756866. DOI: 10.1002/marc.202400661.

Insights into the prospects of nanobiomaterials in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia.

Lu D, Fan X J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):523.

PMID: 39215361 PMC: 11363662. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02805-w.

Application of magnetism in tissue regeneration: recent progress and future prospects.

Guan W, Gao H, Liu Y, Sun S, Li G Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae048.

PMID: 38939044 PMC: 11208728. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae048.

Mineralized Microgels via Electrohydrodynamic Atomization: Optimization and In Vitro Model for Dentin-Pulp Complex.

Cruz-Maya I, Altobelli R, Alvarez-Perez M, Guarino V Gels. 2023; 9(11).

PMID: 37998935 PMC: 10670945. DOI: 10.3390/gels9110846.

References

Ahadian S, Ramon-Azcon J, Estili M, Liang X, Ostrovidov S, Shiku H . Hybrid hydrogels containing vertically aligned carbon nanotubes with anisotropic electrical conductivity for muscle myofiber fabrication. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:4271. PMC: 3958721. DOI: 10.1038/srep04271. View

Ahadian S, Estili M, Surya V, Ramon-Azcon J, Liang X, Shiku H . Facile and green production of aqueous graphene dispersions for biomedical applications. Nanoscale. 2015; 7(15):6436-43. DOI: 10.1039/c4nr07569b. View

Bencherif S, Warren Sands R, Bhatta D, Arany P, Verbeke C, Edwards D . Injectable preformed scaffolds with shape-memory properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(48):19590-5. PMC: 3511752. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211516109. View

Knipe J, Peppas N . Multi-responsive hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Regen Biomater. 2016; 1(1):57-65. PMC: 4669007. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbu006. View

Montgomery M, Ahadian S, Davenport Huyer L, Lo Rito M, Civitarese R, Vanderlaan R . Flexible shape-memory scaffold for minimally invasive delivery of functional tissues. Nat Mater. 2017; 16(10):1038-1046. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4956. View

Gladman A, Matsumoto E, Nuzzo R, Mahadevan L, Lewis J . Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat Mater. 2016; 15(4):413-8. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4544. View

Khan F, Tanaka M . Designing Smart Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 19(1). PMC: 5795968. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19010017. View

Kim S, Lee H, Yu S, Han M, Lee D, Kim S . Hydrogel-laden paper scaffold system for origami-based tissue engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(50):15426-31. PMC: 4687567. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504745112. View

Li Y, Zhang Y, Akpek A, Shin S, Khademhosseini A . 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials. Biofabrication. 2016; 9(1):012001. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/012001. View

10.

Tamayol A, Najafabadi A, Mostafalu P, Yetisen A, Commotto M, Aldhahri M . Biodegradable elastic nanofibrous platforms with integrated flexible heaters for on-demand drug delivery. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9220. PMC: 5569034. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04749-8. View

11.

Alvarez M, Liu J, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Cha B, Vishwakarma A, Ghaemmaghami A . Delivery strategies to control inflammatory response: Modulating M1-M2 polarization in tissue engineering applications. J Control Release. 2016; 240:349-363. PMC: 4945478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.026. View

12.

Tekin H, Ozaydin-Ince G, Tsinman T, Gleason K, Langer R, Khademhosseini A . Responsive microgrooves for the formation of harvestable tissue constructs. Langmuir. 2011; 27(9):5671-9. PMC: 3098811. DOI: 10.1021/la200183x. View

13.

Singh S, Awuah D, Rostam H, Emes R, Kandola N, Onion D . Unbiased Analysis of the Impact of Micropatterned Biomaterials on Macrophage Behavior Provides Insights beyond Predefined Polarization States. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 3(6):969-978. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00104. View

14.

Culver H, Clegg J, Peppas N . Analyte-Responsive Hydrogels: Intelligent Materials for Biosensing and Drug Delivery. Acc Chem Res. 2017; 50(2):170-178. PMC: 6130197. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00533. View

15.

Bertassoni L, Cardoso J, Manoharan V, Cristino A, Bhise N, Araujo W . Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. Biofabrication. 2014; 6(2):024105. PMC: 4040163. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105. View

16.

Raman R, Bashir R . Biomimicry, Biofabrication, and Biohybrid Systems: The Emergence and Evolution of Biological Design. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017; 6(20). DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700496. View