» Articles » PMID: 29977135

IS FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME BETTER AFTER ARTHROPLASTY FOR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN OLDER ADULTS?

Overview
Journal Acta Ortop Bras
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Jul 7
PMID 29977135
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This article evaluated functional recovery and mortality after surgery to repair trochanteric fracture with regard to treatment technique through one year of follow-up.

Method: Eighty consecutive patients with trochanteric fractures were divided into two groups according to treatment technique (osteosynthesis and arthroplasty). We evaluated patient data including age, sex, time to surgery, total hospital stay, transfusion volume, and functional status according to FIM (Functional Independence Measure) scores. Scores for FIM were assessed three times: prior to fracture, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery.

Results: Patients who received osteosynthesis had shorter hospital stays than arthroplasty patients. The arthroplasty group had significantly higher functional independence six months after surgery, while no difference was detected one year after surgery. Patient age, transfusion volume, and FIM scores were detected as significant predictors of mortality.

Conclusion: Trochanteric fractures lead to unavoidable functional loss, although this can be reduced in the short term by treating with arthroplasty instead of osteosynthesis. Age, transfusion and functional situation predict one-year mortality for patients with trochanteric fractures. The patient's functional situation must be considered when choosing treatment for trochanteric fractures in order to reduce patient morbidity. Level of Evidence II; Therapeutic prospective study.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of models for predicting mortality in intertrochanteric fracture surgery patients with perioperative blood transfusion: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Guo J, Geng Q, Xu K, Jing W, Li Z, He J Int J Surg. 2024; 110(8):4754-4766.

PMID: 38652158 PMC: 11325989. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001472.


Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery Patients with Diabetes Mellitus are Prone to Suffer Perioperative Neurological and Endocrine/Metabolic Complications: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

Tang Y, Kang L, Guo M, Fan L Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022; 18:775-783.

PMID: 35967194 PMC: 9365324. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S366846.


Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Hip Arthroplasty in Older Patients: A Narrative Review of Indications and Outcomes.

Martinho T, Stoffel K Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(8).

PMID: 34440969 PMC: 8400749. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57080763.


Super elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures do not predict worse outcomes and higher mortality than elderly patients: a propensity score matched analysis.

Guo J, Wang Z, Fu M, Di J, Zha J, Liu J Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(13):13583-13593.

PMID: 32649313 PMC: 7377837. DOI: 10.18632/aging.103466.

References
1.
Huddleston J, Whitford K . Medical care of elderly patients with hip fractures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001; 76(3):295-8. DOI: 10.4065/76.3.295. View

2.
Bentler S, Liu L, Obrizan M, Cook E, Wright K, Geweke J . The aftermath of hip fracture: discharge placement, functional status change, and mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170(10):1290-9. PMC: 2781759. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp266. View

3.
Wolinsky F, Fitzgerald J, Stump T . The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(3):398-403. PMC: 1381011. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.398. View

4.
Lu X, Wang B, Xu W, Zhang Q, Han D, Zhao Y . [Comparison of calcar replacement arthroplasty and Intertan nail in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the aged]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016; 96(31):2466-71. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.31.006. View

5.
Panula J, Pihlajamaki H, Mattila V, Jaatinen P, Vahlberg T, Aarnio P . Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:105. PMC: 3118151. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-105. View