» Articles » PMID: 29973242

Identification and Validation of Single-sample Breast Cancer Radiosensitivity Gene Expression Predictors

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jul 6
PMID 29973242
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard of care after breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer, despite a majority of patients being over- or under-treated. In contrast to adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, no diagnostic tests are in clinical use that can stratify patients for adjuvant radiotherapy. This study presents the development and validation of a targeted gene expression assay to predict the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and response to adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in primary breast cancer.

Methods: Fresh-frozen primary tumors from 336 patients radically (clear margins) operated on with breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy were collected. Patients were split into a discovery cohort (N = 172) and a validation cohort (N = 164). Genes predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in an Illumina HT12 v4 whole transcriptome analysis were combined with genes identified in the literature (248 genes in total) to develop a targeted radiosensitivity assay on the Nanostring nCounter platform. Single-sample predictors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence based on a k-top scoring pairs algorithm were trained, stratified for estrogen receptor (ER) status and radiotherapy. Two previously published profiles, the radiosensitivity signature of Speers et al., and the 10-gene signature of Eschrich et al., were also included in the targeted panel.

Results: Derived single-sample predictors were prognostic for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in radiotherapy-treated ER+ patients (AUC 0.67, p = 0.01), ER+ patients without radiotherapy (AUC = 0.89, p = 0.02), and radiotherapy-treated ER- patients (AUC = 0.78, p < 0.001). Among ER+ patients, radiotherapy had an excellent effect on tumors classified as radiosensitive (p < 0.001), while radiotherapy had no effect on tumors classified as radioresistant (p = 0.36) and there was a high risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (55% at 10 years). Our single-sample predictors developed in ER+ tumors and the radiosensitivity signature correlated with proliferation, while single-sample predictors developed in ER- tumors correlated with immune response. The 10-gene signature negatively correlated with both proliferation and immune response.

Conclusions: Our targeted single-sample predictors were prognostic for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and have the potential to stratify patients for adjuvant radiotherapy. The correlation of models with biology may explain the different performance in subgroups of breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Radiation Sensitivity Index and 12-Chemokine Gene Expression Signature for Clinical Use in a CLIA Laboratory.

Berglund A, Puskas J, Yoder S, Smith A, Marchion D, Qin D Cancer Res Commun. 2025; 5(3):389-397.

PMID: 39932296 PMC: 11873780. DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0534.


Validation of a breast cancer assay for radiotherapy omission: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Karlsson P, Fyles A, Chang S, Arrick B, Baehner F, Malmstrom P J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024; 117(3):486-495.

PMID: 39423142 PMC: 11884857. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae262.


Evaluating the Radiation Sensitivity Index and 12-chemokine gene expression signature for clinical use in a CLIA laboratory.

Berglund A, Puskas J, Yoder S, Smith A, Marchion D, Qian D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345465 PMC: 11429982. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.19.613957.


Integrating radiosensitivity index and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes reveals SERPINB5 as a radioresistance biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer.

Rao X, Wang X, He C, Jiang Y, Shao Z, Feng Y Clin Transl Med. 2024; 14(8):e1787.

PMID: 39113221 PMC: 11306282. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1787.


Clinical Biomarkers of Tumour Radiosensitivity and Predicting Benefit from Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Bleaney C, Abdelaal H, Reardon M, Anandadas C, Hoskin P, Choudhury A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38792019 PMC: 11119069. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101942.


References
1.
Nielsen T, Wallden B, Schaper C, Ferree S, Liu S, Gao D . Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:177. PMC: 4008304. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-177. View

2.
Sjostrom M, Lundstedt D, Hartman L, Holmberg E, Killander F, Kovacs A . Response to Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Different Breast Cancer Subtypes in the Swedish Breast Cancer Group 91 Radiotherapy Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(28):3222-3229. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7263. View

3.
Ritchie M, Dunning M, Smith M, Shi W, Lynch A . BeadArray expression analysis using bioconductor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(12):e1002276. PMC: 3228778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002276. View

4.
Kyndi M, Sorensen F, Knudsen H, Alsner J, Overgaard M, Nielsen H . Impact of BCL2 and p53 on postmastectomy radiotherapy response in high-risk breast cancer. A subgroup analysis of DBCG82 b&c. Acta Oncol. 2008; 47(4):608-17. DOI: 10.1080/02841860802050746. View

5.
Tramm T, Mohammed H, Myhre S, Kyndi M, Alsner J, Borresen-Dale A . Development and validation of a gene profile predicting benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer: a study of gene expression in the DBCG82bc cohort. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(20):5272-80. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0458. View