» Articles » PMID: 29973191

Comparing Different Intensities of Active Referral to Smoking Cessation Services in Promoting Smoking Cessation Among Community Smokers: a Study Protocol of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Jul 6
PMID 29973191
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Actively referring smokers to smoking cessation (SC) services could increase quitting and is scalable for the population. The objective of this study is to compare 2 different intensities of SC active referral for smokers in the community of Hong Kong.

Methods/design: This is a single-blind, parallel 3-armed cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) consisting of high-intensity SC active referral (HAR Group), low-intensity SC referral by text messaging on promoting SC services use (Text Group) and a control group receives general very brief advice. Biochemically validated daily smokers will be proactively recruited in the community from 68 clusters (recruitment sessions). The primary outcome is self-reported 7-days point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3- and 6- month follow-ups. Secondary outcomes are SC service use, smoking reduction rate (SRR, daily cigarette consumption reduced by ≥50%; excluding quitters) and biochemically validated quit rate (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml). Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Intention-to-treat principle and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) regressions will be used for data analysis.

Discussion: This will be the first trial on evaluating the efficacy of the 2 different intensities of SC active referral on smoking cessation in community smokers. It is anticipated that the results from this trial can provide evidence to the effectiveness of high-intensity active referral to SC services and low intensity SC referral by using text messaging in achieving smoking abstinence.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02804880 , June 17, 2016.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Brief Interventions for Smoking Cessation Performed by Family Doctors.

Chirila S, Grasa C, Gurgas L, Cristurean C, Hanzu-Pazara L, Hangan T Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768864 PMC: 11728199. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121985.


Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation.

Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y, Dobson R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10:CD006611.

PMID: 31638271 PMC: 6804292. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub5.


Prevalence of tobacco related chronic diseases and its role in smoking cessation among smokers in a rural area of Shanghai, China: a cross sectional study.

Wang R, Jiang Y, Yao C, Zhu M, Zhao Q, Huang L BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):753.

PMID: 31196049 PMC: 6567455. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7110-9.


Exploring Community Smokers' Perspectives for Developing a Chat-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention Delivered Through Mobile Instant Messaging: Qualitative Study.

Luk T, Wong S, Lee J, Chan S, Lam T, Wang M JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(1):e11954.

PMID: 30702431 PMC: 6374728. DOI: 10.2196/11954.

References
1.
Hyland A, Borland R, Li Q, Yong H, McNeill A, Fong G . Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii83-94. PMC: 2593055. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.013516. View

2.
Chan S, Wong D, Cheung Y, Leung D, Lau L, Lai V . A block randomized controlled trial of a brief smoking cessation counselling and advice through short message service on participants who joined the Quit to Win Contest in Hong Kong. Health Educ Res. 2015; 30(4):609-21. PMC: 4817085. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv023. View

3.
McDonald P . Population-based recruitment for quit-smoking programs: an analytic review of communication variables. Prev Med. 1999; 28(6):545-57. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0479. View

4.
Guy M, Seltzer R, Cameron M, Pugmire J, Michael S, Leischow S . Relationship between smokers' modes of entry into quitlines and treatment outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2012; 36(1):3-11. PMC: 3864802. DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.36.1.1. View

5.
Vidrine J, Shete S, Cao Y, Greisinger A, Harmonson P, Sharp B . Ask-Advise-Connect: a new approach to smoking treatment delivery in health care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(6):458-64. PMC: 3858085. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3751. View