» Articles » PMID: 29971124

Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Post and Core Materials on Stress Distribution in Radicular Dentin by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Journal J Dent (Tehran)
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Jul 5
PMID 29971124
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of different post and core materials in radicular dentin by three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D FEA).

Materials And Methods: Twelve 3D models of a maxillary central incisor were simulated in the ANSYS 5.4 software program. The models were divided into three groups; the first group included: 1-Gold post and core and 2-Nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) post and core restored with metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). The second group included: 1-Stainless steel post, 2-Titanium post, 3-Carbon fiber post, 4-Glass fiber post, and 5-Quartz fiber post with composite cores and MCRs. The third group included: 1-Zirconia post and core, 2-Zirconia post, 3-Carbon fiber post, 4-Glass fiber post, and 5-Quartz fiber post; the last four models had composite cores restored with all-ceramic restorations (ACRs). Each specimen was subjected to a compressive load at a 45-degree angle relative to its longitudinal axis at a constant intensity of 100 N. The models were analyzed with regard to the stress distribution in dentin.

Results: Two stress concentration sites were detected in the models. The first group showed the lowest stress levels in the cervical region, while the stress levels detected in the second group were higher than those in the first group and lower than those found in the third group. Fiber-reinforced posts induced a higher stress concentration between the middle and cervical thirds of the root compared to other posts.

Conclusions: According to the results, since cast posts induce lower stresses in dentin, they are recommended for clinical use. Fiber-reinforced posts and ACRs caused the maximum stresses in dentin.

Citing Articles

The Accuracy of Custom-Made Milled Metal Posts as Compared to Conventional Cast Metal Posts.

Al-Rubaye T, Elsubeihi E Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39452437 PMC: 11506045. DOI: 10.3390/dj12100309.


Comparative analysis of stress distribution in residual roots with different canal morphologies: evaluating CAD/CAM glass fiber and other post-core materials.

Huang M, Wang B, Zhang K, Yan X, Chen Z, Zhang X BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):337.

PMID: 38491485 PMC: 10943834. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04109-9.


[Maximum compressive stress analysis in upper central incisors rehabilitated with fiberglass posts and three types of crowns. A study with the finite element method].

Chavez Vela M, Lopez Flores A Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 10(3):e125.

PMID: 38389553 PMC: 10880689. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1003-2022-125.


Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Implant Crown Materials on Implant Components and Bone Stress Distribution: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Nokar K, Atri F, Nokar S Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:1896475.

PMID: 38130700 PMC: 10735729. DOI: 10.1155/2023/1896475.


Finite element analysis of maxillary first molar with mesial-occlusal-distal-palatal defect restored with different post-and-core strategies.

Zhong Q, Cao X, Shen Y, Song Y, Wu Y, Qu F Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18131.

PMID: 37496905 PMC: 10366429. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18131.


References
1.
Yang H, Lang L, Guckes A, Felton D . The effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(1):74-80. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115503. View

2.
Sidoli G, King P, Setchell D . An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78(1):5-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70080-5. View

3.
Assif D, Gorfil C . Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71(6):565-7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3. View

4.
ASMUSSEN E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T . Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999; 27(4):275-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00066-9. View

5.
Holmes D, Leary J . Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75(2):140-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90090-6. View