» Articles » PMID: 29968080

Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture Independent of Search Strategy

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2018 Jul 4
PMID 29968080
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An earlier study using the additional singleton task showed that statistical regularities regarding the distractor location can cause an attentional bias that affects the amount of attentional capture by distractors and the efficiency of selection of targets. The distractor singleton was systematically present more often in one location than in all other locations. The present study investigated whether this bias also occurs when observers adopt a feature search mode, i.e., when they search for a specific feature (circle) between elements with different shapes, while ignoring a colored distractor singleton. It is assumed that in feature search, observers can ignore distractors in a top-down way and as such one expects that statistical regularities about the distractor location should not play a role. Contrary to this prediction, we found that even in feature search, both attentional capture by the distractors and the efficiency of selecting the target were impacted by these statistical regularities. Moreover, statistical regularities regarding the feature value of the distractor (its color) had no effect on the amount of capture or the efficiency of selection. We claim that statistical regularities cause passive lingering biases of attention such that on the priority map, the location containing a high probability distractor competes less for attention than locations that are less likely to contain distractors.

Citing Articles

Neural mechanisms of learned suppression uncovered by probing the hidden attentional priority map.

Huang C, van Moorselaar D, Foster J, Donk M, Theeuwes J Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 40008864 PMC: 11864755. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98304.


Reward History and Statistical Learning Independently Impact Attention Search: An ERP Study.

Zhao G, Wu R, Wang H, Chen J, Li S, Wang Q Brain Sci. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39335370 PMC: 11431015. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14090874.


Intentional learning establishes multiple attentional sets that simultaneously guide attention.

Wang S, Woodman G J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 153(9):2314-2327.

PMID: 39088005 PMC: 11377161. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001628.


What is the Role of Spatial Attention in Statistical Learning During Visual Search?.

Golan A, Ramgir A, Lamy D J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):52.

PMID: 39005952 PMC: 11243762. DOI: 10.5334/joc.382.


Prospective Distractor Information Reduces Reward-Related Attentional Capture.

Mahlberg J, Pearson D, Le Pelley M, Watson P J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):50.

PMID: 38910876 PMC: 11192094. DOI: 10.5334/joc.375.


References
1.
Zehetleitner M, Goschy H, Muller H . Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(4):941-57. DOI: 10.1037/a0027629. View

2.
Belopolsky A, Zwaan L, Theeuwes J, Kramer A . The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(5):934-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194124. View

3.
Theeuwes J . Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010; 135(2):77-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006. View

4.
Mounts J . Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Percept Psychophys. 2001; 62(7):1485-93. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212148. View

5.
Awh E, Belopolsky A, Theeuwes J . Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(8):437-43. PMC: 3426354. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. View