» Articles » PMID: 29963419

Soft Tissue Healing and Bony Regeneration of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Sockets, Following Postoperative Incorporation of Platelet-rich Fibrin

Overview
Date 2018 Jul 3
PMID 29963419
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most commonly performed dentoalveolar surgeries by dental surgeons around the globe. It is known to be associated with clinically significant postoperative morbidity including swelling, pain, trismus, fever, and infection. In addition, the residual bony defect takes 7 months to 1 year to gradually fill with bone and to reossify.

Aims And Objective: (1) To carry out a prospective study to evaluate differences in soft tissue healing and bony regeneration of impacted mandibular third molar extraction sites, with and without the incorporation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) within the surgical wounds. (2) To also compare the incidence of short- and long-term posttreatment complications in both cases.

Materials And Methods: Sixty patients were randomly inducted into two groups, consisting of 30 patients each. The first group, which served as the study group, consisted of patients in whom fresh autologous PRF were placed within the extraction site immediately following the surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar, before suturing of the mucoperiosteal flap. The second group, which served as the control froup, included those patients in whom the mucoperiosteal flaps were closed without incorporation of PRF within site. Both groups were evaluated and compared for postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, soft tissue healing, as well as bone fill of the extraction socket.

Results: It was found that the study group in which autologous PRF had been incorporated into the operative site exhibited quick and complication-free soft tissue healing as well as a much quicker reossification and bone fill of the extraction socket, as compared to the control group in which no PRF was used.

Conclusion: Incorporation of PRF within extraction sockets of impacted third molars proved to be beneficial for patients, yielding a quicker postoperative recovery with fewer complications such as postoperative swelling and edema, pain, and trismus; better overall postoperative results in terms of faster soft tissue healing as well as an earlier bony regeneration.

Citing Articles

Hyaluronic acid versus amniotic membrane in wound healing and bone regeneration in extraction sockets - A randomized controlled trial.

Abinav Sundar T, Shetty P, Hegde P, Shreya S J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025; 15(2):305-309.

PMID: 40027867 PMC: 11870173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.027.


Green tea and hyaluronic acid gel enhance fibroblast activation and improves the gingival healing post-third molar extraction.

Bonatto M, da Silva Feltran G, Barbosa T, Pereira D, Santos S, Mendes P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7124.

PMID: 38531928 PMC: 10965904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57821-5.


Evaluation of Efficacy of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Comorbidities Following Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Rao K, Kumar K, Kumar R, Marimallappa T, Pal S, Dutta S Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024; 13(2):184-188.

PMID: 38405558 PMC: 10883221. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_21_23.


Do blood concentrates influence inflammatory signs and symptoms after mandibular third molar surgery? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

de Assis Costa M, Paranhos L, de Almeida V, Oliveira L, Vieira W, Dechichi P Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(12):7045-7078.

PMID: 37884621 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05315-5.


A novel concentrated growth factor (CGF) and bio-oss based strategy for second molar protection after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Sun S, Xu X, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Wei W, Guo K BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):750.

PMID: 37828455 PMC: 10571244. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03411-2.


References
1.
Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, Girard M, Schoeffler C, Dohan S . Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part IV: clinical effects on tissue healing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101(3):e56-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.011. View

2.
Freymiller E, Aghaloo T . Platelet-rich plasma: ready or not?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62(4):484-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.021. View

3.
Gurbuzer B, Pikdoken L, Tunali M, Urhan M, Kucukodaci Z, Ercan F . Scintigraphic evaluation of osteoblastic activity in extraction sockets treated with platelet-rich fibrin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68(5):980-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.092. View

4.
Ogundipe O, Ugboko V, Owotade F . Can autologous platelet-rich plasma gel enhance healing after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(9):2305-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.014. View

5.
Dohan D, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan S, Dohan A, Mouhyi J . Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part III: leucocyte activation: a new feature for platelet concentrates?. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101(3):e51-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.010. View