» Articles » PMID: 29963141

Treatment Effect of Conversion Therapy and Its Correlation with VEGF Expression in Unresectable Rectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jul 3
PMID 29963141
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate the therapeutic effect of conversion therapy and its correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in unresectable rectal cancer with liver metastasis. A total of 116 cases of unresectable rectal cancer patients with liver metastasis were randomly divided into control and observation group, 58 cases in each group, all of these patients were treated by conversion therapy, patients in control were treated by FOLFOXIRI treatment program, and in observation group were treated by FOLFOXIRI program treatment and bevacizumab. Efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups, the levels of VEGF in portal vein and the expression of VEGF in cancer tissue were compared, after 5 years of follow-up, the prognosis of the two groups were observed. Objective efficiency and conversion rate of observation was significantly higher than the control group, survival rate of postoperative observation was significantly higher than that of control group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). The positive rate of VEGF in portal vein blood and the expression of VEGF in the observation was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The 5-year survival rate of VEGF high expression was significantly lower than that of VEGF low expression group (P<0.05). FOLFOXIRI combined with bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatic metastasis of rectal cancer can provide higher conversion rate and hepatectomy opportunities, and reduce VEGF expression in patients with unresectable rectal cancer, which is closely related to VEGF expression, therefore it is beneficial to better local control and to improve long-term survival.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Treatments Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hoang T, Sohn D, Kim B, Cha Y, Kim J Front Oncol. 2022; 11:756214.

PMID: 35223449 PMC: 8864322. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.756214.


Combining Correlated Outcomes and Surrogate Endpoints in a Network Meta-Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Treatments.

Hoang T, Kim J Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(9).

PMID: 32961943 PMC: 7565292. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092663.


Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor as a predictor of complete response for preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Yu J, Lee S, Jeung T, Chang H Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(26):e16190.

PMID: 31261557 PMC: 6617461. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016190.

References
1.
Van Cutsem E, Lenz H, Kohne C, Heinemann V, Tejpar S, Melezinek I . Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(7):692-700. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812. View

2.
Glimelius B, Ristamaki R, Kjaer M, Pfeiffer P, Skovsgaard T, Tveit K . Irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Nordic schedule as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002; 13(12):1868-73. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf324. View

3.
Dunet V, Halkic N, Prior J, Anaye A, Meuli R, Sempoux C . Detection and Viability of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multiparametric PET/CT-MRI Study. Clin Nucl Med. 2017; 42(4):258-263. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001538. View

4.
Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox C . Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2013; 383(9927):1490-1502. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9. View

5.
Venderbosch S, Nagtegaal I, Maughan T, Smith C, Cheadle J, Fisher D . Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(20):5322-30. PMC: 4201568. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0332. View