» Articles » PMID: 29955489

Metabolic Monitoring in Children 5 Years of Age and Younger Prescribed Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2018 Jun 30
PMID 29955489
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this article was to identify the rates of patients ≤5 years of age who received recommended monitoring before and after second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) initiation and had an SGA metabolic adverse effect (MAE).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, an integrated health care delivery system, between January 1, 2002, and June 30, 2011. Commercially insured patients ≤5 years of age newly initiated on an SGA were included. Patients were followed for up to 3 years. Metabolic monitoring included lipid profile, blood glucose, blood pressure, and weight measurements. Patient characteristics and outcomes were described using descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 40 patients were included. Overall, 2 (5.0%) patients received all recommended baseline monitoring, and no (0.0%) patients received all recommended follow-up monitoring. Weight monitoring was completed most frequently with rates of completion of 57.5%, 95.0%, 85.0%, and 76.5% at baseline and years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. At least 1 MAE was identified in 14/40 (35.0%), 5/28 (17.9%), and 2/17 (11.8%) patients during years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most frequent MAE identified was weight gain. Among patients identified with at least 1 MAE, 4/14 (28.6%), 2/5 (40.0%), and 2/2 (100%) received a behavioral intervention during years 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Discussion: Overall, baseline and follow-up metabolic monitoring were poor. Future studies should focus on examining barriers to monitoring in order to improve health care quality.

Citing Articles

Body mass index increase in preschoolers with heterogeneous psychiatric diagnoses treated with risperidone.

Avrahami M, Peskin M, Moore T, Drapisz A, Taylor J, Segal-Gavish H J Psychopharmacol. 2021; 35(9):1134-1140.

PMID: 33892604 PMC: 9426686. DOI: 10.1177/02698811211008592.


Guideline Adherence of Monitoring Antipsychotic Use for Nonpsychotic Indications in Children and Adolescents: A Patient Record Review.

Dinnissen M, Dietrich A, van der Molen J, Verhallen A, Buiteveld Y, Jongejan S J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020; 41(1):13-18.

PMID: 33347017 PMC: 7752226. DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001322.


Long-Term Metabolic Monitoring of Youths Treated with Second-Generation Antipsychotics 5 Years after Publication of the CAMESA Guidelines Are We Making Progress? Surveillance Métabolique à Long Terme des Jeunes Traités par Antipsychotiques de....

Jazi S, Ben-Amor L, Abadie P, Menard M, Choquette R, Berthiaume C Can J Psychiatry. 2020; 66(7):645-656.

PMID: 33243011 PMC: 8243171. DOI: 10.1177/0706743720974847.

References
1.
Rodday A, Parsons S, Mankiw C, Correll C, Robb A, Zima B . Child and adolescent psychiatrists' reported monitoring behaviors for second-generation antipsychotics. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2015; 25(4):351-61. PMC: 4442598. DOI: 10.1089/cap.2014.0156. View

2.
Krill R, Kumra S . Metabolic consequences of second-generation antipsychotics in youth: appropriate monitoring and clinical management. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014; 5:171-82. PMC: 4186493. DOI: 10.2147/AHMT.S49807. View

3.
. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(2):596-601. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.596. View

4.
Pringsheim T, Lam D, Ching H, Patten S . Metabolic and neurological complications of second-generation antipsychotic use in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Saf. 2011; 34(8):651-68. DOI: 10.2165/11592020-000000000-00000. View

5.
Olfson M, Crystal S, Huang C, Gerhard T . Trends in antipsychotic drug use by very young, privately insured children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-201001000-00005. View