» Articles » PMID: 29952893

Evaluation of the In Vivo Kinetics and Biostimulatory Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Hyaluronic Acid Filler

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Jun 29
PMID 29952893
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Because subcutaneously injected hyaluronic acid filler is absorbed over 6 months to 1 year after the treatment of facial wrinkles, frequent retreatment may be required. However, persistent long-term effects are often clinically observed when hyaluronic acid filler is injected as a bolus for facial augmentation. Therefore, the authors investigated, over time, the changes in volume and histologic features of subcutaneous bolus injections of hyaluronic acid.

Methods: Hyaluronic acid filler was subcutaneously injected as a bolus into the dorsum of 6-week-old rats. At several time points (immediately after injection and 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 weeks thereafter), magnetic resonance imaging was introduced to observe morphologic changes and to measure volume. Histologic examination of sectioned tissues was also performed.

Results: The average volume increased for up to 4 weeks after injection and then gradually decreased, with 74.8 percent of the injected volume remaining after 64 weeks, with no statistical difference compared to the initial volume. Histologic analysis revealed that lattice structures were created by fibroblasts and collagen fibers, and blood vessels and adipocytes were also generated in the filler.

Conclusions: Although subcutaneous bolus injections of hyaluronic acid filler exhibited flattening, the total volume was maintained even after 64 weeks. Histologically, hyaluronic acid filler acted as a scaffold for autogenous tissue replacement by means of fibroblast migration and proliferation, collagen induction, and angiogenesis, followed by proliferation of adipocytes. This study demonstrates that the total volume is maintained long-term by replacing part of the injected hyaluronic acid filler with autologous tissues.

Citing Articles

Histologic Evaluation of Early Papilla Healing after Augmentation with Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-A Proof of Concept.

Vela O, Boariu M, Iorio-Siciliano V, Vaduva A, Belova A, Stratul S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064145 PMC: 11278162. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144102.


Cytocompatibility Analysis and Comparison of Different Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Minimally Invasive Esthetics.

Pantermehl S, Foth A, Meyer E, Barbeck M, Jung O In Vivo. 2024; 38(4):1621-1635.

PMID: 38936888 PMC: 11215586. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13612.


Comparative Analyses of Inflammatory Response and Tissue Integration of 14 Hyaluronic Acid-Based Fillers in Mini Pigs.

Choi M, Kwak S, Kim J, Park M, Ko S, Kim T Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021; 14:765-778.

PMID: 34239313 PMC: 8260178. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S315076.


"COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein-related delayed inflammatory reaction to hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: a challenging clinical conundrum in diagnosis and treatment".

Munavalli G, Guthridge R, Knutsen-Larson S, Brodsky A, Matthew E, Landau M Arch Dermatol Res. 2021; 314(1):1-15.

PMID: 33559733 PMC: 7871141. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-021-02190-6.


Model-Based Prediction to Evaluate Residence Time of Hyaluronic Acid Based Dermal Fillers.

Ryu H, Kwak S, Rhee C, Yang G, Yun H, Kang W Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(2).

PMID: 33494145 PMC: 7909806. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020133.