» Articles » PMID: 29946366

Optimal Cut-off Points for Waist Circumference in the Definition of Metabolic Syndrome in Brazilian Adults: Baseline Analyses of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2018 Jun 28
PMID 29946366
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Waist circumference (WC) has been incorporated in the definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) but the exact WC cut-off points across populations are not clear. The Joint Interim Statement (JIS) suggested possible cut-offs to different populations and ethnic groups. However, the adequacy of these cut-offs to Brazilian adults has been scarcely investigated. The objective of the study is to evaluate possible WC thresholds to be used in the definition of MetS using data from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), a multicenter cohort study of civil servants (35-74 years old) of six Brazilian cities.

Methods: We analyzed baseline data from 14,893 participants (6772 men and 8121 women). A MetS was defined according to the JIS criteria, but excluding WC and thus requiring 2 of the 4 remaining elements. We used restricted cubic spline regression to graph the relationship between WC and MetS. We identified optimal cut-off points which maximized joint sensitivity and specificity (Youden's index) from Receiver Operator Characteristic Curves. We also estimated the C-statistics using logistic regression.

Results: We found no apparent threshold for WC in restricted cubic spline plots. Optimal cut-off for men was 92 cm (2 cm lower than that recommended by JIS for Caucasian/Europids or Sub-Saharan African men), but 2 cm higher than that recommended for ethnic Central and South American. For women, optimal cut-off was 86, 6 cm higher than that recommended for Caucasian/Europids and ethnic Central and South American. Optimal cut-offs did not very across age groups and most common race/color categories (except for Asian men, 87 cm).

Conclusions: Sex-specific cut-offs for WC recommended by JIS differ from optimal cut-offs we found for adult men and women of Brazil´s most common ethnic groups.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of obesity according to body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio in Peru: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vasquez-Romero L, Zuzunaga-Montoya F, Loayza-Castro J, Vigil-Ventura E, Ramos W, Vera-Ponce V Obes Pillars. 2025; 13:100166.

PMID: 40028617 PMC: 11869839. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100166.


Exploring the interplay between emotional attitudes towards diabetes, eating behaviour and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Koller O, Andrade T, Machado A, Polet J, Riboldi B, Rodrigues C Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e237.

PMID: 39440420 PMC: 11645113. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024002179.


Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference as Predictors of Above-Average Increased Cardiovascular Risk Assessed by the SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP Calculators and the Proposition of New Optimal Cut-Off Values: Cross-Sectional Single-Center Study.

Suwala S, Junik R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610696 PMC: 11012561. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071931.


Probiotic supplementation for 24 weeks in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: the PROBILIVER randomized clinical trial.

Silva-Sperb A, Moraes H, Barcelos S, de Moura B, Longo L, Michalczuk M Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1362694.

PMID: 38600992 PMC: 11004384. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1362694.


Patterns of metabolic syndrome and associated factors in women from the ELSA-Brasil: a latent class analysis approach.

Galvao N, de Matos S, de Almeida M, Gabrielli L, Barreto S, M L Aquino E Cad Saude Publica. 2023; 39(12):e00039923.

PMID: 38088734 PMC: 10715568. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XEN039923.


References
1.
Sanchez-Castillo C, Velazquez-Monroy O, Berber A, Lara-Esqueda A, Tapia-Conyer R, James W . Anthropometric cutoff points for predicting chronic diseases in the Mexican National Health Survey 2000. Obes Res. 2003; 11(3):442-51. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.60. View

2.
Wang Z, Ma J, Si D . Optimal cut-off values and population means of waist circumference in different populations. Nutr Res Rev. 2010; 23(2):191-9. DOI: 10.1017/S0954422410000120. View

3.
Alberti K, Zimmet P, Shaw J . Metabolic syndrome--a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. 2006; 23(5):469-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01858.x. View

4.
Gouveia L, Marucci M, Lebrao M, Duarte Y . Association between waist circumference (WC) values and hypertension, heart disease (HD) and diabetes, reported by the elderly--SABE Survey: Health, Wellness and Aging, 2000 and 2006. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 59(1):62-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.02.005. View

5.
Hara K, Matsushita Y, Horikoshi M, Yoshiike N, Yokoyama T, Tanaka H . A proposal for the cutoff point of waist circumference for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in the Japanese population. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(5):1123-4. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.2951123. View