» Articles » PMID: 29944717

Excellent Accuracy of ABC/2 Volume Formula Compared to Computer-assisted Volumetric Analysis of Subdural Hematomas

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Jun 27
PMID 29944717
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common disease associated with high morbidity, which is becoming more prominent due to the increasing incidence. Decision for a surgical evacuation is made depending on the clinical appearance and the volume of SDH, wherefore it is important to have a simple 'bedside' method to measure and compare the volume of SDH.

Objective: The aim of the study was to verify the accuracy of the simplified ABC/2 volumetric formula to determine a valuable tool for the clinical practice.

Methods: Preoperative CT-scans of 83 patients with SDHs were used for the computer-assisted volumetric measurement via BrainLab® as well as the ABC/2 volumetric measurement. A = largest length (anterior to posterior) of the SDH; B = maximum width (lateral to midline) 90° to A; C = maximum height (coronal plane or multiplication of slices) of the hematoma. These measurements were performed by two independent clinicians in a blinded fashion. Both volumes were compared by linear regression analysis of Pearson and Bland-Altman regression analysis.

Results: Among 100 SDHs, 53% were under an 47% were over 100cm3 showing a well distribution of the hematoma sizes. There was an excellent correlation between computer-assisted volumetric measurement and ABC/2 (R2 = 0.947, p<0.0001) and no undesirable deviation and trend were detected (p = 0.101; p = 0.777). A 95% tolerance region of the ratios of both methods was [0.805-1.201].

Conclusion: The ABC/2 method is a simple and fast bedside formula for the measurement of SDH volume in a timely manner without limited access through simple adaption, which may replace the computer-assisted volumetric measurement in the clinical and research area. Reason for the good accuracy seems to be the spherical form of SDH, which has a similarity to a half ellipsoid.

Citing Articles

Radiological Outcome of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Relation to Chronic Subdural Hematoma Cause and Architecture.

Abdelghafar A, Falzon A, Hendriks E, Radovanovic I, Andrade H, Schaafsma J Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595860 PMC: 11591691. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111097.


Assessment of nurse practitioners' capacity of using the ABC/2 formula for intracranial lesion volume measurement.

Hu T, Yan Q, Wang X, Yue G, Yu P, Cheng X BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):641.

PMID: 39256738 PMC: 11389227. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02323-y.


"Roberto Rodríguez" General Teaching Hospital of Moron, Ciego De Avila, Cuba, Neurosurgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Services Pediatric Neuromonitoring in Severe Head Trauma.

Abreu Perez D, Lacerda Gallardo A, Antonio Galvez J Neurotrauma Rep. 2024; 5(1):497-511.

PMID: 39036431 PMC: 11257106. DOI: 10.1089/neur.2024.0031.


Endoscopic Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematomas: A New Selection Criterion.

Sam J, Komatsu F, Yamada Y, Tanaka R, Sasaki K, Tamura T Asian J Neurosurg. 2024; 19(2):153-159.

PMID: 38974426 PMC: 11226281. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787101.


Comparative clinical outcomes of irrigation techniques in burr-hole craniostomy for chronic subdural hemorrhage: a multicenter cohort study.

Cho H, Lee H, Jeon Y, Lee W, Cho K Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(6):3059-3067.

PMID: 38951156 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02586-9.


References
1.
Kim H, Yang X, Choi Y, Yoon B, Kim K, Kim D . Abilities of a Densitometric Analysis of Computed Tomography Images and Hemorrhagic Parameters to Predict Outcome Favorability in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2017; 83(2):226-236. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx379. View

2.
Franke C, Versteege C, van Gijn J . The best fit method. A simple way for measuring the volume of an intracerebral haematoma. Neuroradiology. 1988; 30(1):73-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00341948. View

3.
Koc R, Akdemir H, Oktem I, Meral M, Menku A . Acute subdural hematoma: outcome and outcome prediction. Neurosurg Rev. 1997; 20(4):239-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF01105894. View

4.
Bathla G, Policeni B, Hansen M, Berbaum K . Calculating the Tumor Volumes in Vestibular Schwannomas: Are the ABC/2 and Volumetric Methods Comparable?. Otol Neurotol. 2017; 38(6):889-894. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001423. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View