» Articles » PMID: 29937183

Clinical Significance and Prognostic Relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 Genetic Mutation Analysis for Resectable and Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence

Overview
Journal Surg Oncol
Date 2018 Jun 26
PMID 29937183
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hepatic resection is considered the optimal potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Following resection, up to two-thirds of patients will develop recurrence within 5-years. Genetic mutation analysis of CRLM, especially KRAS status, has been proposed as a means to guide treatment, as well as identifying patients who can derive the most survival benefit from hepatic resection.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library through February 8th, 2018. The following algorithm was applied: "(colorectal OR rectal OR colon OR colonic) AND (liver OR hepatic) AND (metastasis OR metastases) AND (gene OR mutation OR KRAS OR BRAF OR SMAD4 OR RAS OR TP53 OR P53 OR APC OR PI3K OR MSI OR EGFR OR MACC1 OR microsatellite)."

Results: From the 2404 records retrieved, 78 studies were finally deemed eligible; 47 studies reported mutational data on patients with resectable CRLM, whereas 31 studies reported on patients with unresectable CRLM. Mutational analyses were mostly performed on the CRLM specimen rather than the primary CRC. The vast majority of studies reported on the KRAS mutational status (88.5%, n = 69/78). Prevalence of KRAS mutations ranged from 25% to 52%. Most studies reported that RAS mutation was a negative prognostic factor for overall (OS) (n = 24) and recurrence-free (RFS) (n = 9) survival; a few reports noted no effect of RAS mutational status on OS (n = 4) or RFS (n = 6). Twelve studies reported on BRAF mutations with a prevalence of BRAF mutation ranging from 0 to 9.1% in resected CRLM specimens. BRAF mutation was strongly associated with a worse prognosis. TP53 and PIK3CA gene mutations did not affect long-term outcomes.

Conclusions: The biological status of each tumor provides the basis for individualized cancer therapeutics. Data on the mutational status on CRLM should be a part of multidisciplinary discussions to help inform the therapeutic approach, type of chemotherapy, as well as timing and approach of surgical resection.

Citing Articles

Invasion and metastasis in cancer: molecular insights and therapeutic targets.

Li Y, Liu F, Cai Q, Deng L, OuYang Q, Zhang X Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):57.

PMID: 39979279 PMC: 11842613. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-025-02148-4.


Pathogenetic development, diagnosis and clinical therapeutic approaches for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (Review).

Jin Z, Li Y, Yi H, Wang M, Wang C, Du S Int J Oncol. 2025; 66(3).

PMID: 39950314 PMC: 11844340. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2025.5728.


Molecular characterization of the histopathological growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastases by RNA sequencing of targeted samples at the tumor-liver interface.

Latacz E, Verheul S, Sillis Y, Van Dam P, Doukas M, Grunhagen D Clin Exp Metastasis. 2024; 42(1):1.

PMID: 39666203 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10319-w.


Early onset metastatic colorectal cancer patients as a distinctive clinical and molecular phenomenon.

Pretta A, Ziranu P, Perissinotto E, Ghelardi F, Marmorino F, Giampieri R Br J Cancer. 2024; 132(2):188-194.

PMID: 39604610 PMC: 11756416. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02902-5.


New insights into macrophage polarization and its prognostic role in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Khanduri I, Maki H, Verma A, Katkhuda R, Anandappa G, Pandurengan R BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):37.

PMID: 39516662 PMC: 11523988. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-024-00056-8.