» Articles » PMID: 29935051

Who Can Tolerate a Marginal Kidney? Predicting Survival After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant by Donor-recipient Combination

Overview
Journal Am J Transplant
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Jun 24
PMID 29935051
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The impact of donor quality on post-kidney transplant (KT) survival may vary by candidate condition. Characterizing this variation would increase access to KT without sacrificing outcomes. We developed a tool to estimate post-KT survival for combinations of donor quality and candidate condition. We studied deceased donor KT recipients (n = 120 818) and waitlisted candidates (n = 376 272) between 2005 and 2016 by using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Donor quality and candidate condition were measured by using the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and the Estimated Post Transplant Survival (EPTS) score. We estimated 5-year post-KT survival based on combinations of KDPI and EPTS score using random forest algorithms and waitlist survival by EPTS score using Weibull regressions. Survival benefit was defined as absolute reduction in mortality risk with KT. For candidates with an EPTS score of 80, 5-year waitlist survival was 47.6%, and 5-year post-KT survival was 78.9% after receiving kidneys with a KDPI of 20 and was 70.7% after receiving kidneys with a KDPI of 80. The impact of KDPI on survival benefit varied greatly by EPTS score. For candidates with low EPTS scores (eg, <40), the KDPI had limited impact on survival benefit. For candidates with middle or high EPTS scores (eg, >40), survival benefit decreased with higher KDPI but was still substantial even with a KDPI of 100 (>16 percentage points). Our prediction tool (www.transplantmodels.com/kdpi-epts) can support individualized decision-making on kidney offers in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Educational interventions improve disparities in patient access to kidney transplantation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Godoi A, Koimtzis G, Felix N, Mora M, Graziani E Sousa A, Soares G Int J Surg. 2025; 110(12):8151-8160.

PMID: 39806752 PMC: 11634108. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002154.


Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Clinical Applications and Challenges.

Singh P, Goyal L, Mallick D, Surani S, Kaushik N, Chandramohan D Kidney Med. 2025; 7(1):100927.

PMID: 39803417 PMC: 11719832. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100927.


Push toward pre-emptive kidney transplantation - for sure?.

Cseprekal O, Jacquelinet C, Massy Z Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(12):sfae335.

PMID: 39698373 PMC: 11653007. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae335.


Adjusted Donor Age: A Clinical Score to Support Organ Acceptance Decisions in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Bright R, Mahler C, Adwaney A, Dosani D, Morganti E, Friedl F Transpl Int. 2024; 37:13477.

PMID: 39575125 PMC: 11578704. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13477.


Advancing Kidney Transplantation: A Machine Learning Approach to Enhance Donor-Recipient Matching.

Alowidi N, Ali R, Sadaqah M, Naemi F Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410523 PMC: 11475881. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192119.


References
1.
Browner W, Hulley S . Effect of risk status on treatment criteria. Implications of hypertension trials. Hypertension. 1989; 13(5 Suppl):I51-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i51. View

2.
Bertsimas D, Kung J, Trichakis N, Wojciechowski D, Vagefi P . Accept or Decline? An Analytics-Based Decision Tool for Kidney Offer Evaluation. Transplantation. 2017; 101(12):2898-2904. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001824. View

3.
Heilman R, Green E, Reddy K, Moss A, Kaplan B . Potential Impact of Risk and Loss Aversion on the Process of Accepting Kidneys for Transplantation. Transplantation. 2017; 101(7):1514-1517. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001715. View

4.
Rao P, Schaubel D, Guidinger M, Andreoni K, Wolfe R, Merion R . A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation. 2009; 88(2):231-6. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac620b. View

5.
Lau B, Cole S, Gange S . Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170(2):244-56. PMC: 2732996. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp107. View